Skip to main content

IoT drives field activity


For this discussion let's think about work in two buckets, scheduled and unscheduled. Scheduled covers things like preventative maintenance, project work, essentially anything that is scheduled or preplanned.  Unscheduled work; also known as a service call or any ad hoc request for work. In context of remote monitoring, which has been around for many years, a significant impact in the coming years will materialize for both scheduled and unscheduled field activity.



The idea is not really that novel; however, the world is changing significantly with regards to sensors and monitoring. For the most part the costs per point and the availability of data, it's mash up, and the analytics to make it relevant and actionable, are all becoming more accessible with this new wave often referred to as the "Internet of things". These points of input, when digested by folks that actually understand what they mean, can influence who we send to an unscheduled activity or when we are actually going to the field to perform scheduled routines.



"Transactional work order management systems in five years may not even exist, with the exception of very sophisticated plant operations requiring component and subcomponent monitoring and reporting". Instead the arduous process that currently takes place today to set up either rounds for patients, activities through a care plan, or PM visits for piece of equipment or building will all shift from a calendar based or subjective important point of reference to condition generated activities. The patients or equipment will reach out when maintenance needs to be performed.  We will see the outcomes driving the need for service activity.



Next post:  blending internal and external labor

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Digital distance

As influential Irene entered the dispatch department this hot July afternoon all that she heard was the tapping of keyboards.   The energy felt like a controlled, almost clinical environment.   It wasn't that many years ago when the sense of chaos, wrapped in genuine human concern for our clients, filled the room with a much different feeling.   Could it be that our ambitions to become more efficient, by leveraging technology has simply created a reason for us not to communicate verbally with one another?    Hasn't the idea all along been centered around our ability to spend more time with our customers? Making each and every one of them feel as if they are our most important client?   Certainly I'm not suggesting we go back to big chief tablets and number two pencils.   Yet, we need to reflect and strike a balance between digitization and delivery. By pure coincidence, avid Andy was composing a memo attempting to give his opinion, without tr...