Skip to main content

Do no harm


Having endured another restless night, Oscar reaches for the alarm.   His mind wanders as he recalls the nightmare which seems to be top of mind, even as the sun peaks through the windows.   Their service company,  WeHelpU was in court defending their position regarding the data breach at the "TrustMe nuclear plant".   They,  like many other service providers, WeHelpU jumped on the IoT bandwagon a couple of years ago.  It didn't take long for Oscar to become overwhelmed, current situation aside, what about the thousands of our other customers?



A couple of years ago, in 2018, we established  rules of engagement to prevent us from being in this situation, where did we fail?



  • Air Gap | at first we were very disciplined to only install non-intrusive monitoring.  As our skills and knowledge broadened we started making exceptions.   Hey, we can save some capital if we just connect to the existing control system?
  • Cellular | while very tempting we stood our ground and never connected to the clients network,  sensors to the  gateway and gateway to the cloud.
  • Anonymized | this was the trickiest of all.  Fact is we have lots of sensors and actuators which all tie to assets,  which belong to sites,  sites which belong to clients.   Whether structured data sets or metadata tags, they are all vulnerable.   The short term recall of data is powerful for scheduled and unscheduled activity and needs to relate to the customer.   Long term data is helpful for models and AI, this data should be anonymous.



Our discipline, or lack thereof, will impact our organizations and our clients.   We simply don't know what we don't know, be curious but cautious.



-----

Next post:  who's data is it?

Thoughts?  feel free to leave replies or direct message

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworker.com

-----


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...
Post a Comment
Read more

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed...
Post a Comment
Read more

show me the money

This could definitely be one of those topics where you may be hearing voices. One voice, used when speaking with others, is telling folks that your career and the ability to make a difference is much more important than what you are being paid. While on the other hand your other voice, and I have noticed this voice gets louder and softer depending upon your age and circumstances, may be screaming get as much as you can for the work you're currently performing.   Isn't it really all about purpose?   How else can you explain schoolteachers, police and firemen, and the United States Military; all driven by the visceral desire to help and change people's lives. We certainly know, with the exception of a few in the aforementioned careers, they are not in it for the money (indeed, something seems very backwards here).   Evidence exists (@mercer) that shows if you are paying a worker within the normal range of income for their position then it is likely that being motivated ...
Post a Comment
Read more