Skip to main content

Drop your work order systems


We all felt pretty damn good about ourselves for the last couple of decades transferring our service companies to wireless work order management systems.  Think about it, what did we do? Did we simply evolve the paper ticket, from radio dispatch, to wireless distribution? How would you feel, after all of these years, that we exerted effort towards the wrong target!  Certainly these tools helped us gain efficiency and improve the perception of our customers that we were digitally savvy.  Aren't we really paid to preserve and make more energy efficient our customers assets (equipment)?  Our best intentions to streamline and create visibility was still dependent on highly subjective traffic cops (our dispatchers).  Did we move forward or just sideways and maybe even a bit back (especially when you think about the personal connections with our clients that is sometimes muted by technology).



The gap between work order and asset management systems has come to life as the result of objective points of input and the rising influence of IoT.   Somewhere in your future lies your ability to consume information from devices and assets and adjust your logic regarding if you will send a human or make a machine to machine correction. A mechanism will still need to exist to advise a fieldworker where to go and what to do, yet in a normal routine will come from an asset and not another human. Transitioning from a  work order centric environment to an asset centric environment, similar to healthcare and oil and gas, will be quite an undertaking. Start now so you can be prepared when you are ready to start consuming digital information from assets in the field. Let the asset, the one thing we are paid as service companies to protect, dictate when and where service will be required.



Best of luck



-----

Next post:  corrective actions help the service business?
-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Digital distance

As influential Irene entered the dispatch department this hot July afternoon all that she heard was the tapping of keyboards.   The energy felt like a controlled, almost clinical environment.   It wasn't that many years ago when the sense of chaos, wrapped in genuine human concern for our clients, filled the room with a much different feeling.   Could it be that our ambitions to become more efficient, by leveraging technology has simply created a reason for us not to communicate verbally with one another?    Hasn't the idea all along been centered around our ability to spend more time with our customers? Making each and every one of them feel as if they are our most important client?   Certainly I'm not suggesting we go back to big chief tablets and number two pencils.   Yet, we need to reflect and strike a balance between digitization and delivery. By pure coincidence, avid Andy was composing a memo attempting to give his opinion, without tr...