Skip to main content

Science and Service | is AI cultural?

Irene was beaming with pride this morning as she shared the conversation last night with her daughter Izzy. One of Izzy's college courses was to conduct research based on a handful of Harvard business studies. At a high level these studies were comparing organizations from three different approaches; keep doing what they're doing, except change but only incrementally, focus on changing in industry by deliberately disrupting the status quo.
People were gathering as Irene began to play back the conversation. Mom, exclaimed Izzy, after listening to each bit of explanation on the three Harvard studies it was quite difficult to make a decision on which one was correct. The first example; "leave the business alone we are making money" made some excellent points, continued Izzy, however I really felt as though the rationale had much stronger value in the past and was not preparing organizations for our high velocity changing future. The second use case, "incremental change, slow and steady wins the race" certainly has its merits. Unfortunately, it was easy to see that the reason for this approach had more to do with other factors such as bonuses and fear. Izzy paused for a minute and I couldn't tell what direction she was going to head, just then she burst out, "the third option of going all in and doing something very different was the most exciting for me". Irene remembered the goosebumps as she listened to the excitement in Izzy's voice.
Irene continued to share Izzy's story; our professor advised us to make sure that we looked at each of these three examples objectively, but that seemed next to impossible as the first two were just copout's. It was the final approach that seemed to make the most sense. Hey, if we were not surrounded by the convergence of sensors, data sciences, algorithms, and the ability to mash information up from multiple sources, maybe the other two had some merit. That simply was not the case in 2018. We have the opportunity to take advantage of information, leverage the science around what we were doing, and simply work smarter. There was no stopping Izzy now as she had incredible momentum, and as she continued explaining why science had to play a role for the business to survive, Irene was grinning from ear to ear. What a perfect moment.
The room was silent as Irene's work associates hung on every word, vicariously enjoying the happiness Irene exuded from every ounce of her being. It wasn't just the story about Izzy and how others in the room had reflected or hoped to be able to share a story about their child one day, instead the room was filled with optimism that a generation entering the work force might not be saddled with the constraints that hold us back when contemplating innovation. We have all had conversations about green, sustainability, predictive modeling, and even some with prescriptive modeling. None of these are trivial tasks and the mass amount of effort to take your business from a traditional to a science-based environment takes one dose of technology and four doses of cultural change. IIoT systems will act like modern networks, socializing connected product data to foster unparalleled knowledge and collaboration. When I see the future, summarized Irene, the reality that no product or asset will be an island, fills me with energy to keep pushing forward.
-----
Next post: magnificent models
Thoughts? feel free to leave replies or direct message
See all "last mile worker" posts here: http://lastmileworkersolutions.com
-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Who owns the data?

Finally the capital budget allows you to replace some very old equipment.    You can't open a trade magazine without seeing the latest news regarding the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).   Lucky for you the equipment manufacturers are offering an IIoT ready solution packaged with your equipment.   Suddenly your enthusiasm turns to confusion as you review the details of the quote.   What the hell is that subscription fee?   Isn't this equipment mine; lock, stock and barrel?   You mean to tell me that I need to pay the manufacturer, every month,   to give me the luxury of accessing data produced by the equipment I just purchased?   The only explanation has to be new math, at least as a child this is what my parents told me when I asked hard to answer questions. It's amazing how history repeats itself, we are starting to see manufacturer specific data languages appearing in their "smart" equipment.   Didn't we learn our lesson ...