Skip to main content

We are one | the sum of its part..ners


Damned if you do, damned if you don't, isn't that how the saying goes thought Trustless Terry.  It seemed like just yesterday when "Take it Easy" by the Eagles was playing on the radio, a time where a hand shake meant everything.   Add a bit of spit and you had a commitment that could not be broken, you know like a promise made by John Gotti himself.  My word is my bond.



Just then Avid Andy walked into Terry's office.  Terry started to talk about using partners to fulfill customer requests.  Terry continued, "on one hand we know with all certainty that in order to provide the greatest value to our customers we will need to use partners. Unfortunately we also can still feel the sting of a partner who stole our customer after we introduced them to one another".   As Andy's head was nodding in agreement he decided to contribute an additional perspective.



Terry, said Andy, I would like to believe that every business always had the customer's interests at the top of their list. The reality is that customers interests are one of the variables used to make informed business decisions. With the advent of the "gig economy" service providers have begun to lose their leverage in deciding how work is executed and by whom. It's quite a conundrum, the customer sees flexibility to mix-and-match service providers, the service organization assumes the risk in delivering a solution. When you really think about it Terry we need to consider several things when contemplating the use of non-company resources, such as:


  • is it core? the lowest hanging fruit will always be those functions requested by a customer which are not core to our mission as a service organization. This can get a bit tricky, sometimes egos influence our decision process
  • is it legal? regardless of industry or location, many rules exist regarding the blending of workforces. Wages, insurance, certifications, licensing, union and nonunion, it deserves your attention
  • is it profitable? If I can sell all the materials, which is normally my highest margin opportunity, and markup my external labor providers numbers, and not take on the potential risk of executing the work, does it start to make sense?



Moral: past experiences should influence, yet not dictate your future

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Digital distance

As influential Irene entered the dispatch department this hot July afternoon all that she heard was the tapping of keyboards.   The energy felt like a controlled, almost clinical environment.   It wasn't that many years ago when the sense of chaos, wrapped in genuine human concern for our clients, filled the room with a much different feeling.   Could it be that our ambitions to become more efficient, by leveraging technology has simply created a reason for us not to communicate verbally with one another?    Hasn't the idea all along been centered around our ability to spend more time with our customers? Making each and every one of them feel as if they are our most important client?   Certainly I'm not suggesting we go back to big chief tablets and number two pencils.   Yet, we need to reflect and strike a balance between digitization and delivery. By pure coincidence, avid Andy was composing a memo attempting to give his opinion, without tr...