Skip to main content

Really, I am that good

So which is it, inquired pondering Pete, do you believe that I have the answer to your problem or do you simply have faith in me as a problem solver? Legendary Lee responded; I think the answer to that question has changed over time. Years ago when a variable speed drive failed you most likely had to call an expert to repair that piece of electronic equipment. Yet today if I am electrically inclined, it is possible a search of the Internet may reveal ideas which will assist me in solving the problem myself. Not too different from those game shows that allow you "a lifeline" to call a trusted friend for assistance. Today our lifeline is a digital platform and its seemingly boundless search data, whereas yesterday with limited communication, all of the expertise resided with analog-isolated individuals. 
  
Lee continued, so which is better the person that has all the answers or the person who can get all the answers? In some ways it boils down to your beliefs around education and the significance of building fundamental competencies.  If you consider for a moment that access to information in today's day and age is more important than, what other competencies are essential to deliver outstanding service? The attributes at the top of my list might be empathy, trust, curiosity, innate skill, attitude, and intelligence.  Unfortunately many of those attributes are difficult to train, however given the right environment can certainly be nurtured. Now Pete was completely confused, he was looking for a short answer to the complex question of "who is the best person to hire". 
  
Pete recalls a job applicant which he visited with just last week. "He just walked into my office full of attitude and proclaimed, yes it's hard to believe I really am that good!". At first Pete didn't know what to think, was this guy just an arrogant ass or was he so filled with confidence that he could find the answer to any problem put in front of him? Would his approach be welcomed or resented by our customers and teammates? Lee suggested maybe a little bit of both. The real trick is to measure folks and qualify them objectively. Answering the riddle of "I really am that good" must be achieved by monitoring performance across a period of time, aligned to conditions which positively impact the customer experience.  If your process is filled with subjective ranking scores such as yelp and or a net promoter style score then your results will always be controversial. However, when you and your team can agree upon objective points of measurement worked into an analysis system which is dynamic and relevant, your customers and employees with thank you.   
  
It seemed like Pete was starting to come around, you must have the core competencies, confidence and the proper culture to produce an all-star team.  When things are not firing on all cylinders you may get too much confidence and produce prima donnas or too little and end up with those who feel entitled.  Lee finished up with one final statement, Pete; achieving balance is key; competency, confidence, and culture.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

suggesting is NOT selling

People and companies want to buy from people that they trust.   The individual which possesses the broadest set of knowledge will gain the most credibility and as a result yield high levels of trust.   When I was in the field I definitely had the ear of the customer and for the most part discussed areas that needed improvement or replacement. At no moment was I ever, at least in my mind, selling. Instead, as I think back on those days, I believe I was simply "suggesting". Take an immediate need, add in a trusted advisor and a credible suggestion, you will most likely get a sale. However, this is not selling. From my non-salesman perspective I would sum up the following related to the sales process; sales is not a single event but instead a sequence of connection points which create a positive experience that leads to a purchase . Over the years I've been fortunate to have known many different types of salespeople in different industries and I believe that they a...

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...

focus on your annuity base, come on man..

Stick with what you know and repeat often. When I think about maintenance, regardless of type of contract, I think about consistency, consistency, consistency. The motivation behind writing this post is to encourage you to either build or bolster your existing maintenance base, here are some things to consider: most maintenance contracts should yield between 5% and 7% additional revenue above and beyond the contract value.   Building trust between you and your clients organization will result in additional service activity. Full risk contracts, or those where you were charging one flat amount and taking all of the financial risk, can be profitable.   Watch out for the age of the equipment, service call track record, and customer disposition pull-through opportunities can be constrained with full risk contracts unless the scope of work is very specific. This can be a bit of a slippery slope. The perception of a...