Skip to main content

Is Innovation Impossible?


Ingenious Igor seemed to be perplexed when Avid Andy asked, "Igor how would you describe Innovation".  Andy, started Igor in a crackling voice, Innovation is anything where the output causes a shift in direction.  You see Andy, many assume that change and innovation are synonyms, that is not the case.  Instead, continued Igor, Innovation is the whole package; creative and often disruptive design, deliberate deployment, and absolute adoption.  After a pregnant pause Igor blurted out, Innovation is a tall order and success is only realized after the "I believe button" changes to an "I can't live without" admission by naysayers and supporters alike.  Depending upon the directional impact and breadth of the innovation, the transformation could take weeks, months, or years.



Inspiring innovation across the organization is different for everyone; however, a few thoughts may help get you started:



  • Undisputable destination | no surprise for anyone reading my past posts, you absolutely must answer the question of why.  So many times we focus on what and even how, with innovation these focal points will generally over complicate the objective.  Speaking from personal experience, on more than one occasion, starting a journey without a crystal clear destination will find you wandering aimlessly, burning resources, credibility and support.  Spend time understanding the importance of your innovation for the practitioner and the business.
  • Reserved socialization | timing is EVERYTHING.  A very delicate balance happens early on in the idea gestation phase.  If you are introducing a concept which is highly disruptive or WAY outside of the box, the release of information to others outside of the core team will need to be strategic.  Be careful as you need to get far enough for others to see your vision; however, not so far that others do not feel part of the solution.  Be sincere, you must believe if you expect others to get on board, trust and passion are essential.
  • Top down, bottom up |  this is very hard to answer as it depends on the leadership, their style, operating locations, past performance.  Innovation has never occurred, or a misunderstanding that the last Accounting upgrade was innovative,  absolutely top down.  Ideation meetings, free flowing and sharing of ideas, bottoms up is effective (as these types of organizations are generally flat).  My experience has shown that a good mix of top down and bottom up is the best approach.



As with many things in business, an Innovation leader must have a solid IQ and a strong EQ (emotional quotient).  I would add, in the era of digital transformation, that your DQ (digital quotient), that's right I just made the last one up, must be accomplished.  Igor slapped Andy on the shoulder and said, after work let's discuss this more over a few shots of Vodka.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Digital distance

As influential Irene entered the dispatch department this hot July afternoon all that she heard was the tapping of keyboards.   The energy felt like a controlled, almost clinical environment.   It wasn't that many years ago when the sense of chaos, wrapped in genuine human concern for our clients, filled the room with a much different feeling.   Could it be that our ambitions to become more efficient, by leveraging technology has simply created a reason for us not to communicate verbally with one another?    Hasn't the idea all along been centered around our ability to spend more time with our customers? Making each and every one of them feel as if they are our most important client?   Certainly I'm not suggesting we go back to big chief tablets and number two pencils.   Yet, we need to reflect and strike a balance between digitization and delivery. By pure coincidence, avid Andy was composing a memo attempting to give his opinion, without tr...