Skip to main content

parts are parts, or are they?


The plain simple truth is most service businesses would not survive without parts.  On one extreme parts can be considered materials for projects; or those parts you sell during a service call. How many service companies do you know that would allow a client to say… "just send somebody and I will provide the parts". Unfortunately, as we all know this happens many times in commercial building environments where management companies may want to procure their own materials. Of course, from a revenue and profitability perspective (because a lot of us apply the hardware model to price parts, the smaller the dollar value the higher the mark-up) parts are important. 



One of the biggest challenges service organizations have, regardless of size, is the ability to compel purchasing behavior. When you take a project that is for the most part being managed by either a procurement manager or a project manager, the purchasing of materials can be fairly straightforward. In the other case when you relinquish your control to the field and allow purchasing to be managed directly by field technicians, the results can vary. Many factors influence the decision criteria around where and which part to purchase. The real key is ensuring that we drive the most value in that purchase. Value includes the price, distance to procure the part, OEM requirement or not, etc..  All of these aspects can be joined together to form the best value based decision.  As hard as the field technicians may try to drive the best value into an organization, they just do not have enough information.  This is where we see procurement or marketplace systems really shine.  Our ability to compel decisions at the point of purchase by using tools that can aggregate, catalog, and compare the value between suppliers.  PO books, P Cards, credit cards, are all certainly effective in the service business, however, you are simply not getting the most value that you can out of your material purchases.  Regardless of your size you should reassess your purchasing process as you are likely leaving money on the table.



-----

Next post:  improving customer perception

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

suggesting is NOT selling

People and companies want to buy from people that they trust.   The individual which possesses the broadest set of knowledge will gain the most credibility and as a result yield high levels of trust.   When I was in the field I definitely had the ear of the customer and for the most part discussed areas that needed improvement or replacement. At no moment was I ever, at least in my mind, selling. Instead, as I think back on those days, I believe I was simply "suggesting". Take an immediate need, add in a trusted advisor and a credible suggestion, you will most likely get a sale. However, this is not selling. From my non-salesman perspective I would sum up the following related to the sales process; sales is not a single event but instead a sequence of connection points which create a positive experience that leads to a purchase . Over the years I've been fortunate to have known many different types of salespeople in different industries and I believe that they a...

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...

focus on your annuity base, come on man..

Stick with what you know and repeat often. When I think about maintenance, regardless of type of contract, I think about consistency, consistency, consistency. The motivation behind writing this post is to encourage you to either build or bolster your existing maintenance base, here are some things to consider: most maintenance contracts should yield between 5% and 7% additional revenue above and beyond the contract value.   Building trust between you and your clients organization will result in additional service activity. Full risk contracts, or those where you were charging one flat amount and taking all of the financial risk, can be profitable.   Watch out for the age of the equipment, service call track record, and customer disposition pull-through opportunities can be constrained with full risk contracts unless the scope of work is very specific. This can be a bit of a slippery slope. The perception of a...