Skip to main content

parts are parts, or are they?


The plain simple truth is most service businesses would not survive without parts.  On one extreme parts can be considered materials for projects; or those parts you sell during a service call. How many service companies do you know that would allow a client to say… "just send somebody and I will provide the parts". Unfortunately, as we all know this happens many times in commercial building environments where management companies may want to procure their own materials. Of course, from a revenue and profitability perspective (because a lot of us apply the hardware model to price parts, the smaller the dollar value the higher the mark-up) parts are important. 



One of the biggest challenges service organizations have, regardless of size, is the ability to compel purchasing behavior. When you take a project that is for the most part being managed by either a procurement manager or a project manager, the purchasing of materials can be fairly straightforward. In the other case when you relinquish your control to the field and allow purchasing to be managed directly by field technicians, the results can vary. Many factors influence the decision criteria around where and which part to purchase. The real key is ensuring that we drive the most value in that purchase. Value includes the price, distance to procure the part, OEM requirement or not, etc..  All of these aspects can be joined together to form the best value based decision.  As hard as the field technicians may try to drive the best value into an organization, they just do not have enough information.  This is where we see procurement or marketplace systems really shine.  Our ability to compel decisions at the point of purchase by using tools that can aggregate, catalog, and compare the value between suppliers.  PO books, P Cards, credit cards, are all certainly effective in the service business, however, you are simply not getting the most value that you can out of your material purchases.  Regardless of your size you should reassess your purchasing process as you are likely leaving money on the table.



-----

Next post:  improving customer perception

-----
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...
Post a Comment
Read more

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Who owns the data?

Finally the capital budget allows you to replace some very old equipment.    You can't open a trade magazine without seeing the latest news regarding the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).   Lucky for you the equipment manufacturers are offering an IIoT ready solution packaged with your equipment.   Suddenly your enthusiasm turns to confusion as you review the details of the quote.   What the hell is that subscription fee?   Isn't this equipment mine; lock, stock and barrel?   You mean to tell me that I need to pay the manufacturer, every month,   to give me the luxury of accessing data produced by the equipment I just purchased?   The only explanation has to be new math, at least as a child this is what my parents told me when I asked hard to answer questions. It's amazing how history repeats itself, we are starting to see manufacturer specific data languages appearing in their "smart" equipment.   Didn't we learn our lesson ...
Post a Comment
Read more