Skip to main content

irreplacable? finger in the glass


The room was filled with conversations regarding how special each of our operations are in providing superior service to our clients. In the corner, trying to blend in with the furniture, reluctant Ruth was hearing every fourth word as her consistently negative attitude was impacting her comprehension.  Each participant, searching for that elusive silver bullet, which would allow their customers to see them as irreplaceable.  Ruth remembered that time when her father, skeptical Sam, asked that she conduct an experiment with him one fine afternoon. It was really quite straightforward, Sam placed a clear glass of water in front of Ruth and asked her to put her finger in the middle of the glass. Now the trick is, commented her father, when your finger leaves the water, and a hole remains, you are irreplaceable.



Having just a couple of years in the service business, it was hard for Ruth to grasp what her father Sam was really telling her.  Ruth, a committed naysayer, was not stupid. Every place she looked change was happening at a rate never seen before in our industry. How can we prevent our service company from suffering the same fate as other industries unwilling to look past their profitable perches?  We must align directly with our clients business objectives and remain willing to adapt our operations accordingly. Years ago we may have differentiated ourselves by "self-performing everything"; identified ourselves as the only organization that can help you with "X" type of equipment; convinced you that our years of experience trumps any version of artificial or augmented intelligence.  If this is you, enjoy taking pictures with your Kodak film camera at that Blockbuster video store.



I don't believe anyone is irreplaceable. Time spent building trust and fortifying relationships is only worthwhile when you sincerely open your mind to welcoming change. The days of us "knowing all the answers" are quickly evaporating in the rearview mirror.



-----

Next post:  who's data is it?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking AI (artifical intelligence)

You're talking but I can't hear you.   Everyone can certainly understand this condition; the "Peanuts" parents who sounded exactly like your own, your significant other while you watch your favorite game on TV, or most importantly a work colleague or partner which you are attempting to communicate a thought or vision.   All of these, and many other examples, have plagued our organizations long past the childhood game of telephone (passing your words to another, and on to another, etc.).   So what?   What has changed?   Besides the velocity of products hitting the market, the requirements that we have for our business now needs to be interpreted by data scientists, yet another abstraction layer from the field conditions.   Think about this example; TODAY :   we often think in binary terms, if "x" happens do "y" …   take a sales person seeking potential leads by searching a system for the last time we made contact TOMMOR...

months to aquire, moments to lose

It is just hard to imagine that one of the most common reasons maintenance contracts are lost is because people don't show up and don't pay attention to the details.   In many cases maintenance is an investment to keep the life of your asset running for a protracted period of time. However the length on many maintenance contracts is not even close to the life expectancy of that equipment, so if you don't really have any idea what maintenance is being performed then how do you really know if it's being done to your specification? Thus, it really boils down to business elements, assuming that you are actually performing the work, our focus needs to be on how you are differentiated. Let's take a look at a couple of the most common business-related reasons why people lose maintenance contracts. Not showing up ; managing contracts can be complicated between the sites, number of assets, and the frequencies at which items need to be maintained, can a...

is seeing comprehending?

Oh yeah, visual inspections are why God gave us eyes.   There is not a single machine learning, IoT, computerized environment that can match the skills a human's brain can assess and deliver based on visual feedback. The trick is making sure that the person connected to those eyeballs actually knows what they are looking for!   Face it, aren't the best workers those that can recognize an issue long before it becomes a problem? So instead, is the challenge really not that they can visually see, but instead that they can comprehend and correlate potential challenges? While we have many different definitions for "wisdom" in context of this topic, I think about it as those individuals which have had the most experience, both good and bad. Coincidentally I am a firm believer that the best service people are those that make the most frequent mistakes. When I was in the field I had lots of experience screwing things up. The difference is that I would always check and tri...