Skip to main content

Profitable pain


Are you familiar with the pigeon theory? It goes like this, a pigeon is standing on a rooftop and looks over her shoulder just to see a cat poised and ready to have a quick feather filled meal. The pigeon has occupied this roof so many times that she turns a blind eye to the impending danger.  Well, despite her confidence you can probably predict the conclusion. If not, I encourage you to read the history of Eastman Kodak, Blockbuster, as well as many other organizations that simply refused, were scared, or too arrogant to reinvent themselves.  They simply paused when they should have pivoted.



Service organizations are ripe for change,  we have not fundamentally disrupted the way we deliver service for decades.  Digital transformation, and the myriad definitions which accompany this latest business trend, is not referring to your sophisticated use of Microsoft Excel.  Instead we find ourselves contemplating the appropriate use, application, and insights of data being collected within our organizations and from our clients field assets. As you may have read from my past posts, you do not need to boil the ocean; however, you should begin experimenting and evaluating new tools and business practices. 



In a world where everything is connected it also means that anything can be disrupted.  The way we engage our customers, procure materials, wrestle with digital expectations from the sites we service to the workers we employ.  Our journey is just beginning into a truly connected field service environment, while you will likely endure some pain along the way, this transformation will leave an indelible mark on your organization.



-----

Next post:  from the field to the office

-----




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking AI (artifical intelligence)

You're talking but I can't hear you.   Everyone can certainly understand this condition; the "Peanuts" parents who sounded exactly like your own, your significant other while you watch your favorite game on TV, or most importantly a work colleague or partner which you are attempting to communicate a thought or vision.   All of these, and many other examples, have plagued our organizations long past the childhood game of telephone (passing your words to another, and on to another, etc.).   So what?   What has changed?   Besides the velocity of products hitting the market, the requirements that we have for our business now needs to be interpreted by data scientists, yet another abstraction layer from the field conditions.   Think about this example; TODAY :   we often think in binary terms, if "x" happens do "y" …   take a sales person seeking potential leads by searching a system for the last time we made contact TOMMOR...
Post a Comment
Read more

months to aquire, moments to lose

It is just hard to imagine that one of the most common reasons maintenance contracts are lost is because people don't show up and don't pay attention to the details.   In many cases maintenance is an investment to keep the life of your asset running for a protracted period of time. However the length on many maintenance contracts is not even close to the life expectancy of that equipment, so if you don't really have any idea what maintenance is being performed then how do you really know if it's being done to your specification? Thus, it really boils down to business elements, assuming that you are actually performing the work, our focus needs to be on how you are differentiated. Let's take a look at a couple of the most common business-related reasons why people lose maintenance contracts. Not showing up ; managing contracts can be complicated between the sites, number of assets, and the frequencies at which items need to be maintained, can a...
Post a Comment
Read more

is seeing comprehending?

Oh yeah, visual inspections are why God gave us eyes.   There is not a single machine learning, IoT, computerized environment that can match the skills a human's brain can assess and deliver based on visual feedback. The trick is making sure that the person connected to those eyeballs actually knows what they are looking for!   Face it, aren't the best workers those that can recognize an issue long before it becomes a problem? So instead, is the challenge really not that they can visually see, but instead that they can comprehend and correlate potential challenges? While we have many different definitions for "wisdom" in context of this topic, I think about it as those individuals which have had the most experience, both good and bad. Coincidentally I am a firm believer that the best service people are those that make the most frequent mistakes. When I was in the field I had lots of experience screwing things up. The difference is that I would always check and tri...
Post a Comment
Read more