Skip to main content

Big brother or just good business


The fact of the matter is that you really have no idea where your field workers are if you don't have some form of connection between their location and your operation.  It seems that many folks can wrap their heads around the idea of GPS and how it makes sense for business, both from the field and office perspectives. When properly positioned logic will prevail, that is, if there is an underlying foundation of trust. Things can get really jacked up if a plan for GPS in trucks or on the technicians person, is discussed and implemented without a broad understanding of the business purpose. If we believe that people want to do the right thing then for the most part this should be a nonissue, with the exception of those individuals that are doing things outside of the lines of prudent behavior. So the fundamental reason why GPS tracking fails, or causes turmoil within a business, has really nothing to do with the tracking or the technology! You need to sit down and ask yourself, and hopefully involve others within your organization, why is it important for you to have GPS.  From a pure client value perspective the fact is I would like to know where the field worker is located so I may better satisfy the requests of my clients. Ultimately the ability to route our workers based on their current location, and the workload in the queue, we should be able to leverage our resources more efficiently, bring greater value to the customer, and drop some additional dollars to our bottom line.



When I ponder what the best technology is to apply to any situation I find myself always looking out the outcome first, and then working back from that point to choose the right technology. If you consider this objective "reduce my response time by 10%", then your approach may be twofold; reduce your response time from your current location to the requester's location, and minimize the windshield time for your field technician. In order to achieve these approaches where should the GPS be placed? Years ago people would have said hands-down GPS is on the truck, however with the current proliferation of mobile devices and their ability to provide GPS data, it seems as if the mobile device would be the logical choice. How often have you seen your field workers without their mobile device? If you agree with this logic than a mobile device should be the tool of choice.  Whether you end up choosing a truck or mobile device, advanced dispatch routing or queue-based logic, in order to be successful with the deployment of GPS in any capacity you need to first start with building trust. 


-----

Next post:  ways to lose a maintenance contract

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...