Skip to main content

Big brother or just good business


The fact of the matter is that you really have no idea where your field workers are if you don't have some form of connection between their location and your operation.  It seems that many folks can wrap their heads around the idea of GPS and how it makes sense for business, both from the field and office perspectives. When properly positioned logic will prevail, that is, if there is an underlying foundation of trust. Things can get really jacked up if a plan for GPS in trucks or on the technicians person, is discussed and implemented without a broad understanding of the business purpose. If we believe that people want to do the right thing then for the most part this should be a nonissue, with the exception of those individuals that are doing things outside of the lines of prudent behavior. So the fundamental reason why GPS tracking fails, or causes turmoil within a business, has really nothing to do with the tracking or the technology! You need to sit down and ask yourself, and hopefully involve others within your organization, why is it important for you to have GPS.  From a pure client value perspective the fact is I would like to know where the field worker is located so I may better satisfy the requests of my clients. Ultimately the ability to route our workers based on their current location, and the workload in the queue, we should be able to leverage our resources more efficiently, bring greater value to the customer, and drop some additional dollars to our bottom line.



When I ponder what the best technology is to apply to any situation I find myself always looking out the outcome first, and then working back from that point to choose the right technology. If you consider this objective "reduce my response time by 10%", then your approach may be twofold; reduce your response time from your current location to the requester's location, and minimize the windshield time for your field technician. In order to achieve these approaches where should the GPS be placed? Years ago people would have said hands-down GPS is on the truck, however with the current proliferation of mobile devices and their ability to provide GPS data, it seems as if the mobile device would be the logical choice. How often have you seen your field workers without their mobile device? If you agree with this logic than a mobile device should be the tool of choice.  Whether you end up choosing a truck or mobile device, advanced dispatch routing or queue-based logic, in order to be successful with the deployment of GPS in any capacity you need to first start with building trust. 


-----

Next post:  ways to lose a maintenance contract

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

suggesting is NOT selling

People and companies want to buy from people that they trust.   The individual which possesses the broadest set of knowledge will gain the most credibility and as a result yield high levels of trust.   When I was in the field I definitely had the ear of the customer and for the most part discussed areas that needed improvement or replacement. At no moment was I ever, at least in my mind, selling. Instead, as I think back on those days, I believe I was simply "suggesting". Take an immediate need, add in a trusted advisor and a credible suggestion, you will most likely get a sale. However, this is not selling. From my non-salesman perspective I would sum up the following related to the sales process; sales is not a single event but instead a sequence of connection points which create a positive experience that leads to a purchase . Over the years I've been fortunate to have known many different types of salespeople in different industries and I believe that they a...

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...

focus on your annuity base, come on man..

Stick with what you know and repeat often. When I think about maintenance, regardless of type of contract, I think about consistency, consistency, consistency. The motivation behind writing this post is to encourage you to either build or bolster your existing maintenance base, here are some things to consider: most maintenance contracts should yield between 5% and 7% additional revenue above and beyond the contract value.   Building trust between you and your clients organization will result in additional service activity. Full risk contracts, or those where you were charging one flat amount and taking all of the financial risk, can be profitable.   Watch out for the age of the equipment, service call track record, and customer disposition pull-through opportunities can be constrained with full risk contracts unless the scope of work is very specific. This can be a bit of a slippery slope. The perception of a...