Skip to main content

Big brother or just good business


The fact of the matter is that you really have no idea where your field workers are if you don't have some form of connection between their location and your operation.  It seems that many folks can wrap their heads around the idea of GPS and how it makes sense for business, both from the field and office perspectives. When properly positioned logic will prevail, that is, if there is an underlying foundation of trust. Things can get really jacked up if a plan for GPS in trucks or on the technicians person, is discussed and implemented without a broad understanding of the business purpose. If we believe that people want to do the right thing then for the most part this should be a nonissue, with the exception of those individuals that are doing things outside of the lines of prudent behavior. So the fundamental reason why GPS tracking fails, or causes turmoil within a business, has really nothing to do with the tracking or the technology! You need to sit down and ask yourself, and hopefully involve others within your organization, why is it important for you to have GPS.  From a pure client value perspective the fact is I would like to know where the field worker is located so I may better satisfy the requests of my clients. Ultimately the ability to route our workers based on their current location, and the workload in the queue, we should be able to leverage our resources more efficiently, bring greater value to the customer, and drop some additional dollars to our bottom line.



When I ponder what the best technology is to apply to any situation I find myself always looking out the outcome first, and then working back from that point to choose the right technology. If you consider this objective "reduce my response time by 10%", then your approach may be twofold; reduce your response time from your current location to the requester's location, and minimize the windshield time for your field technician. In order to achieve these approaches where should the GPS be placed? Years ago people would have said hands-down GPS is on the truck, however with the current proliferation of mobile devices and their ability to provide GPS data, it seems as if the mobile device would be the logical choice. How often have you seen your field workers without their mobile device? If you agree with this logic than a mobile device should be the tool of choice.  Whether you end up choosing a truck or mobile device, advanced dispatch routing or queue-based logic, in order to be successful with the deployment of GPS in any capacity you need to first start with building trust. 


-----

Next post:  ways to lose a maintenance contract

-----
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking AI (artifical intelligence)

You're talking but I can't hear you.   Everyone can certainly understand this condition; the "Peanuts" parents who sounded exactly like your own, your significant other while you watch your favorite game on TV, or most importantly a work colleague or partner which you are attempting to communicate a thought or vision.   All of these, and many other examples, have plagued our organizations long past the childhood game of telephone (passing your words to another, and on to another, etc.).   So what?   What has changed?   Besides the velocity of products hitting the market, the requirements that we have for our business now needs to be interpreted by data scientists, yet another abstraction layer from the field conditions.   Think about this example; TODAY :   we often think in binary terms, if "x" happens do "y" …   take a sales person seeking potential leads by searching a system for the last time we made contact TOMMORR
Post a Comment
Read more

Are "mistakes" good or bad?

One of the attributes that make a great technician is the fact that they have made a lot of mistakes. Our biggest challenge is recalling those mistakes ourselves and as importantly sharing them with others on our team. Every single day we go out and fix things, many of them are routine and may not require any form of documentation or sharing; however, there are those instances where we have discovered gold. The trick is to make sure that we can learn from our mistakes in a systematic manner and have the ability to spread the information throughout our organization in a useful and relevant way. Corrective action, an integral part of a quality system, is the absolute best vehicle to put in place for your organization. Some of you may have been turned off by the words "quality system", don't worry you can still deploy a corrective culture without having to understand completely how corrective action and quality management systems work. The process is very straightf
Post a Comment
Read more

months to aquire, moments to lose

It is just hard to imagine that one of the most common reasons maintenance contracts are lost is because people don't show up and don't pay attention to the details.   In many cases maintenance is an investment to keep the life of your asset running for a protracted period of time. However the length on many maintenance contracts is not even close to the life expectancy of that equipment, so if you don't really have any idea what maintenance is being performed then how do you really know if it's being done to your specification? Thus, it really boils down to business elements, assuming that you are actually performing the work, our focus needs to be on how you are differentiated. Let's take a look at a couple of the most common business-related reasons why people lose maintenance contracts. Not showing up ; managing contracts can be complicated between the sites, number of assets, and the frequencies at which items need to be maintained, can a
Post a Comment
Read more