Skip to main content

expert at everything...not a problem


Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of managing these shifting sands becomes overwhelming. As a result people are commonly pigeon holed into what they or others around them perceive them to be an expert, unfortunate for all.



I venture to say that the reason that this is not done is because the entire idea of it, while logical enough, is not very simple to execute. Quantifying skill sets is very fundamental however creating relative meaning to those as they apply to the work activities is challenging and needs to be examined across all dimensions. As IoT based information becomes more actionable specific faults will require very specific skill sets.  A one-to-one match will unfortunately yield flat and lackluster results. So who is the real benefactor? People who have chosen a service career, regardless of industry, have done so because they enjoy a challenge. Confining the type of work an individual receives eventually will lead to boredom and complacency. Thinking one person is an expert at everything is ludicrous. While I agree that this is convenient, it simply is just not right for the organization or the worker. As organizations we have the responsibility to make sure that people are placed in areas at which they can create the most value. People must be able to go home at the end of the day and know that they really have made a difference. The good news is, this is not very difficult. If you have the right toolset and the commitment to follow through you will be simply amazed at the results.





The "last mile" of profitability lies within your workforces, what are you doing to address these assumptions? Would love to hear your feedback. Thanks in advance…. Greg



-----

Next post:  are visual inspections important?

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...

Who owns the data?

Finally the capital budget allows you to replace some very old equipment.    You can't open a trade magazine without seeing the latest news regarding the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).   Lucky for you the equipment manufacturers are offering an IIoT ready solution packaged with your equipment.   Suddenly your enthusiasm turns to confusion as you review the details of the quote.   What the hell is that subscription fee?   Isn't this equipment mine; lock, stock and barrel?   You mean to tell me that I need to pay the manufacturer, every month,   to give me the luxury of accessing data produced by the equipment I just purchased?   The only explanation has to be new math, at least as a child this is what my parents told me when I asked hard to answer questions. It's amazing how history repeats itself, we are starting to see manufacturer specific data languages appearing in their "smart" equipment.   Didn't we learn our lesson ...