Skip to main content

is seeing comprehending?


Oh yeah, visual inspections are why God gave us eyes.  There is not a single machine learning, IoT, computerized environment that can match the skills a human's brain can assess and deliver based on visual feedback. The trick is making sure that the person connected to those eyeballs actually knows what they are looking for!  Face it, aren't the best workers those that can recognize an issue long before it becomes a problem? So instead, is the challenge really not that they can visually see, but instead that they can comprehend and correlate potential challenges? While we have many different definitions for "wisdom" in context of this topic, I think about it as those individuals which have had the most experience, both good and bad. Coincidentally I am a firm believer that the best service people are those that make the most frequent mistakes. When I was in the field I had lots of experience screwing things up. The difference is that I would always check and triple check my work, for the most part nobody else saw those mistakes but me. So we add another dimension to this visual inspection paradox, if I see it and I attempted to work on it but don't double check my work is the third variable, "I just don't give a crap".



Possibly the capability of visual inspection combined with the attributes of comprehending how the pieces fit together, and topped with either a good or bad attitude, can measure up to tell you whether you have a good worker or a poor worker. In essence it's this amalgamation of variables that separate your workforce from strong to weak. A friend of mine, Haig Nalbantian, would describe these in in Mercer's internal labor market model (@mercer) as labor stocks. Value and outcomes are achieved when you can take these labor stocks; punch them through enabling tools, and flow out the other side the right combination of capabilities, attitudes and attributes which positively affect the value you have to your client. Was it Einstein who said "repeating the same process and expecting different results is the definition of insanity"? Isn't that what many of you do day in and day out as we talk about managing and optimizing workforces?  It's time for us to connect the simple act of visual inspection to the valuable components of intuition. For the most part this cannot be accomplished with individuals and instead needs to leverage tools which take in these factors to create "best performer scenarios". If we allow ourselves to only look at things across a single dimension then how are we any better than the human race prior to Christopher Columbus taking sail when the World was assumed to be flat!



-----

Next post:  employees motivated by money?

-----
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking AI (artifical intelligence)

You're talking but I can't hear you.   Everyone can certainly understand this condition; the "Peanuts" parents who sounded exactly like your own, your significant other while you watch your favorite game on TV, or most importantly a work colleague or partner which you are attempting to communicate a thought or vision.   All of these, and many other examples, have plagued our organizations long past the childhood game of telephone (passing your words to another, and on to another, etc.).   So what?   What has changed?   Besides the velocity of products hitting the market, the requirements that we have for our business now needs to be interpreted by data scientists, yet another abstraction layer from the field conditions.   Think about this example; TODAY :   we often think in binary terms, if "x" happens do "y" …   take a sales person seeking potential leads by searching a system for the last time we made contact TOMMOR...
Post a Comment
Read more

Are "mistakes" good or bad?

One of the attributes that make a great technician is the fact that they have made a lot of mistakes. Our biggest challenge is recalling those mistakes ourselves and as importantly sharing them with others on our team. Every single day we go out and fix things, many of them are routine and may not require any form of documentation or sharing; however, there are those instances where we have discovered gold. The trick is to make sure that we can learn from our mistakes in a systematic manner and have the ability to spread the information throughout our organization in a useful and relevant way. Corrective action, an integral part of a quality system, is the absolute best vehicle to put in place for your organization. Some of you may have been turned off by the words "quality system", don't worry you can still deploy a corrective culture without having to understand completely how corrective action and quality management systems work. The process is very straightf...
Post a Comment
Read more

months to aquire, moments to lose

It is just hard to imagine that one of the most common reasons maintenance contracts are lost is because people don't show up and don't pay attention to the details.   In many cases maintenance is an investment to keep the life of your asset running for a protracted period of time. However the length on many maintenance contracts is not even close to the life expectancy of that equipment, so if you don't really have any idea what maintenance is being performed then how do you really know if it's being done to your specification? Thus, it really boils down to business elements, assuming that you are actually performing the work, our focus needs to be on how you are differentiated. Let's take a look at a couple of the most common business-related reasons why people lose maintenance contracts. Not showing up ; managing contracts can be complicated between the sites, number of assets, and the frequencies at which items need to be maintained, can a...
Post a Comment
Read more