Skip to main content

is seeing comprehending?


Oh yeah, visual inspections are why God gave us eyes.  There is not a single machine learning, IoT, computerized environment that can match the skills a human's brain can assess and deliver based on visual feedback. The trick is making sure that the person connected to those eyeballs actually knows what they are looking for!  Face it, aren't the best workers those that can recognize an issue long before it becomes a problem? So instead, is the challenge really not that they can visually see, but instead that they can comprehend and correlate potential challenges? While we have many different definitions for "wisdom" in context of this topic, I think about it as those individuals which have had the most experience, both good and bad. Coincidentally I am a firm believer that the best service people are those that make the most frequent mistakes. When I was in the field I had lots of experience screwing things up. The difference is that I would always check and triple check my work, for the most part nobody else saw those mistakes but me. So we add another dimension to this visual inspection paradox, if I see it and I attempted to work on it but don't double check my work is the third variable, "I just don't give a crap".



Possibly the capability of visual inspection combined with the attributes of comprehending how the pieces fit together, and topped with either a good or bad attitude, can measure up to tell you whether you have a good worker or a poor worker. In essence it's this amalgamation of variables that separate your workforce from strong to weak. A friend of mine, Haig Nalbantian, would describe these in in Mercer's internal labor market model (@mercer) as labor stocks. Value and outcomes are achieved when you can take these labor stocks; punch them through enabling tools, and flow out the other side the right combination of capabilities, attitudes and attributes which positively affect the value you have to your client. Was it Einstein who said "repeating the same process and expecting different results is the definition of insanity"? Isn't that what many of you do day in and day out as we talk about managing and optimizing workforces?  It's time for us to connect the simple act of visual inspection to the valuable components of intuition. For the most part this cannot be accomplished with individuals and instead needs to leverage tools which take in these factors to create "best performer scenarios". If we allow ourselves to only look at things across a single dimension then how are we any better than the human race prior to Christopher Columbus taking sail when the World was assumed to be flat!



-----

Next post:  employees motivated by money?

-----

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

resilience, do you believe?

Seeking out the closest spot to the door of the office was not a common practice; however, at 07:00 on August 24th, 2022 the temperature was already 96' and 98% humidity.   The building would have a hell of a time keeping up today, rolling black-outs and brown-outs would be inevitable.   It likely won't be an outright equipment shut-down, instead we will have to endure the impending "brown-out" conditions, a slow, low voltage and high amperage stressing of our electrical infrastructure and connected systems. Our deliberate and continuous leverage of Industrial IoT (IIoT) technology and the companion AI prescriptive models have positioned us well. It had to be around the year 2018 when we invested in IIoT.   Heck, most were comparing our endeavors to the "Nest" thermostat, a pioneer (yet very fundamental) entrée into home-based IoT.   Naysayers were laughing that we would never see the benefits; however, our fragile National infrastructure and Mothe...
Post a Comment
Read more

is your "score", you?

Avid Andy begins to wonder if he may be schizophrenic.   Or could it be a sign of true genius when he can see a problem from all sides? Andy was reflecting on a service meeting that happened last week.   Conversation was around our ability to objectively measure things and make better decisions. At the center of almost any measurement environment are the fundamentals of math. To determine priority or influence, it seems logical when dealing with inanimate objects like sensors, assets, and sites in a portfolio to move towards "point-based systems". The real dilemma for Andy seemed to comes when we begin scoring humans and letting pre-determined algorithms establish an individuals path. Our service meeting quickly changed from tactical to philosophical discussions and one of the technicians, Pragmatic Paul, made mention of a black mirror program (Netflix) named "Nosedive".    In this futuristic episode, an individuals score dictates their behavior and those ...
Post a Comment
Read more

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...
Post a Comment
Read more