Skip to main content

open kimono, we are partners


We all know that one of the biggest challenges in the service business is managing customer expectations and response times. The simple fact is certain times of year there is much more demand than we have in supply (techs).  In all of the years I've been involved in service, I would venture to say that this challenge between supply and demand is the root cause of anxiety amongst our customers.  We have hidden behind a veil of excuses in the past that weren't easy to track. For instance if we were not able to return to your location we might blame it on the parts, "hey once the parts arrive we will certainly come out and fix your equipment". All along we delicately balance what resources we have to satisfy the best paying and squeakiest wheel requests. The expectations of our customers, and frankly the transparency that computerized systems often provide, we must break the mold and stop hiding behind these excuses.



Why can't we just provide the facts?  If we have efficiently defined the amount of supply that we have (our direct employees) and then blended those with resources external to our organization (subcontractors) then shouldn't we be able to flex as required to demand? Sure I can hear the naysayers through the tip of my pen, "don't bring in the subcontractor that does similar work because they will poach our customers". While I can't completely disqualify the sentiment, the fact is that blending your labor forces between internal and external labor to allow you to expand and contract is the way of the future. The root problem has nothing to do with labor, instead it has everything to do with trust. I'm referring to trust from all angles, the trust you have with a subcontractor, and most importantly the trust your customer has with you to tell them "how it is". Nobody is a miracle worker and while many clients may profess that they expect you to be "Johnny on the spot" every single time I would challenge you that the reason they say that is because you haven't provided them with visibility.  If you shared with them that you are deliberately selecting resources to go to sites based off of information regarding their sense of urgency (I only have one air-conditioner versus the other request that has 10 air-conditioners) don't you think that they would actually be on board and be more of a partner with you?



While we are enticed by new technologies often we may apply these tools without actually modifying our business approach. Information shared with your client is not bad if you have nothing to hide.



-----

Next post:  what is pull through and how is it optimized?

-----

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

resilience, do you believe?

Seeking out the closest spot to the door of the office was not a common practice; however, at 07:00 on August 24th, 2022 the temperature was already 96' and 98% humidity.   The building would have a hell of a time keeping up today, rolling black-outs and brown-outs would be inevitable.   It likely won't be an outright equipment shut-down, instead we will have to endure the impending "brown-out" conditions, a slow, low voltage and high amperage stressing of our electrical infrastructure and connected systems. Our deliberate and continuous leverage of Industrial IoT (IIoT) technology and the companion AI prescriptive models have positioned us well. It had to be around the year 2018 when we invested in IIoT.   Heck, most were comparing our endeavors to the "Nest" thermostat, a pioneer (yet very fundamental) entrée into home-based IoT.   Naysayers were laughing that we would never see the benefits; however, our fragile National infrastructure and Mothe...
Post a Comment
Read more

is your "score", you?

Avid Andy begins to wonder if he may be schizophrenic.   Or could it be a sign of true genius when he can see a problem from all sides? Andy was reflecting on a service meeting that happened last week.   Conversation was around our ability to objectively measure things and make better decisions. At the center of almost any measurement environment are the fundamentals of math. To determine priority or influence, it seems logical when dealing with inanimate objects like sensors, assets, and sites in a portfolio to move towards "point-based systems". The real dilemma for Andy seemed to comes when we begin scoring humans and letting pre-determined algorithms establish an individuals path. Our service meeting quickly changed from tactical to philosophical discussions and one of the technicians, Pragmatic Paul, made mention of a black mirror program (Netflix) named "Nosedive".    In this futuristic episode, an individuals score dictates their behavior and those ...
Post a Comment
Read more

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...
Post a Comment
Read more