Skip to main content

open kimono, we are partners


We all know that one of the biggest challenges in the service business is managing customer expectations and response times. The simple fact is certain times of year there is much more demand than we have in supply (techs).  In all of the years I've been involved in service, I would venture to say that this challenge between supply and demand is the root cause of anxiety amongst our customers.  We have hidden behind a veil of excuses in the past that weren't easy to track. For instance if we were not able to return to your location we might blame it on the parts, "hey once the parts arrive we will certainly come out and fix your equipment". All along we delicately balance what resources we have to satisfy the best paying and squeakiest wheel requests. The expectations of our customers, and frankly the transparency that computerized systems often provide, we must break the mold and stop hiding behind these excuses.



Why can't we just provide the facts?  If we have efficiently defined the amount of supply that we have (our direct employees) and then blended those with resources external to our organization (subcontractors) then shouldn't we be able to flex as required to demand? Sure I can hear the naysayers through the tip of my pen, "don't bring in the subcontractor that does similar work because they will poach our customers". While I can't completely disqualify the sentiment, the fact is that blending your labor forces between internal and external labor to allow you to expand and contract is the way of the future. The root problem has nothing to do with labor, instead it has everything to do with trust. I'm referring to trust from all angles, the trust you have with a subcontractor, and most importantly the trust your customer has with you to tell them "how it is". Nobody is a miracle worker and while many clients may profess that they expect you to be "Johnny on the spot" every single time I would challenge you that the reason they say that is because you haven't provided them with visibility.  If you shared with them that you are deliberately selecting resources to go to sites based off of information regarding their sense of urgency (I only have one air-conditioner versus the other request that has 10 air-conditioners) don't you think that they would actually be on board and be more of a partner with you?



While we are enticed by new technologies often we may apply these tools without actually modifying our business approach. Information shared with your client is not bad if you have nothing to hide.



-----

Next post:  what is pull through and how is it optimized?

-----
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking AI (artifical intelligence)

You're talking but I can't hear you.   Everyone can certainly understand this condition; the "Peanuts" parents who sounded exactly like your own, your significant other while you watch your favorite game on TV, or most importantly a work colleague or partner which you are attempting to communicate a thought or vision.   All of these, and many other examples, have plagued our organizations long past the childhood game of telephone (passing your words to another, and on to another, etc.).   So what?   What has changed?   Besides the velocity of products hitting the market, the requirements that we have for our business now needs to be interpreted by data scientists, yet another abstraction layer from the field conditions.   Think about this example; TODAY :   we often think in binary terms, if "x" happens do "y" …   take a sales person seeking potential leads by searching a system for the last time we made contact TOMMOR...
Post a Comment
Read more

Are "mistakes" good or bad?

One of the attributes that make a great technician is the fact that they have made a lot of mistakes. Our biggest challenge is recalling those mistakes ourselves and as importantly sharing them with others on our team. Every single day we go out and fix things, many of them are routine and may not require any form of documentation or sharing; however, there are those instances where we have discovered gold. The trick is to make sure that we can learn from our mistakes in a systematic manner and have the ability to spread the information throughout our organization in a useful and relevant way. Corrective action, an integral part of a quality system, is the absolute best vehicle to put in place for your organization. Some of you may have been turned off by the words "quality system", don't worry you can still deploy a corrective culture without having to understand completely how corrective action and quality management systems work. The process is very straightf...
Post a Comment
Read more

months to aquire, moments to lose

It is just hard to imagine that one of the most common reasons maintenance contracts are lost is because people don't show up and don't pay attention to the details.   In many cases maintenance is an investment to keep the life of your asset running for a protracted period of time. However the length on many maintenance contracts is not even close to the life expectancy of that equipment, so if you don't really have any idea what maintenance is being performed then how do you really know if it's being done to your specification? Thus, it really boils down to business elements, assuming that you are actually performing the work, our focus needs to be on how you are differentiated. Let's take a look at a couple of the most common business-related reasons why people lose maintenance contracts. Not showing up ; managing contracts can be complicated between the sites, number of assets, and the frequencies at which items need to be maintained, can a...
Post a Comment
Read more