Skip to main content

Who owns the data?


Finally the capital budget allows you to replace some very old equipment.   You can't open a trade magazine without seeing the latest news regarding the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).  Lucky for you the equipment manufacturers are offering an IIoT ready solution packaged with your equipment.  Suddenly your enthusiasm turns to confusion as you review the details of the quote.  What the hell is that subscription fee?  Isn't this equipment mine; lock, stock and barrel?  You mean to tell me that I need to pay the manufacturer, every month,  to give me the luxury of accessing data produced by the equipment I just purchased?  The only explanation has to be new math, at least as a child this is what my parents told me when I asked hard to answer questions.



It's amazing how history repeats itself, we are starting to see manufacturer specific data languages appearing in their "smart" equipment.  Didn't we learn our lesson twenty years ago that holding the customer hostage with access to automation code, parts, and now IIoT data is not a sustainable plan?  We must keep in mind that most of the information presented is a by-product of sensors required to efficiently operate the equipment, great, well done.  If I had a crystal ball I would have the following predictions:

  1. 2018 the allure of IIoT data is a point of differentiation for the manufacturer allowing them to sell products at a premium
  2. 2021 IIoT data will be the ante to even sell equipment, IIoT data will be used as a loss leader following the successful "fremium" licensing model.  Did HP and others make ink jet printers to sell printers?  No way, they wanted to sell printer ink.



Hold your ground, if you are the end user or the service provider, purchase equipment from those allowing access to all data points (not just the ones that are appearing on BacNET point sheets).  Turn the tables and allow the manufacturers to access the data and outcomes that you are creating through your IIoT initiatives.  We have always said the one that turns the wrenches wins; however, I would add the one that owns the data has created a new annuity stream.



-----

Next post:  from the field to the office

Thoughts?  feel free to leave replies or direct message

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworkersolutions.com

-----




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is custom software in 2019 spelled EGO?

I still struggle , as do many, with the rationalization between building software and buying software. Microsoft Excel , likely one of the most widely recognized packaged software applications, was released over 30 years ago . My guess is not many people would consider building a custom piece of software which performs math and other worksheet related tasks. While this is an obvious example, it highlights an important factor for many in deciding between custom and configurable software solutions . Fact is, everybody understands how Microsoft Excel works. Let's mix it up a bit and add the opinions that you have regarding what makes your approach to business so special.   The things that you do, in an industry, which are totally unique to your competitors.   This is where it gets a bit murky, we must tease out the transactional components from the value add aspects of software.   For instance, you use a staffing system to help find, manage, and retain internal and external

no one told you when to run

From the clients perspective, what is the perfect service call? "To interpret my field conditions and apply a solution which resolves the issue immediately and ensures trouble-free long-term operation. Delivered by a professional, courteous, empathetic, appropriately skilled, years of experience, materials required for repair, a good listener, and one that treats me as if I am their only customer; amen"! As you might expect the perfect service call is really a blend of attitudes, attributes, and capabilities. The trick is, while we all may agree that these aspects make the perfect service call, endeavoring to achieve these results is becoming increasingly more difficult. Our customers, with their visibility and awareness of our activities, raise the bar regarding the level of service that we need to provide. Let's unpack a few of these elements: Appropriately skilled :   haven't we all had this discussion in the past?   My workers are all

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed prope