Skip to main content

Digital coaches, empathy in action




It had to be about halfway through my drive into work that I began to feel a throbbing pain in my forearms and hands. I was clutching the steering wheel so tightly as the anxiety continued to build regarding the changes happening at the office this morning. So, I decided, like any red blooded American, to search my iPod (2007 model) for the quintessential song to help me through this moment; "Eye of the Tiger" by the appropriately named band Survivor. Even I, Overwhelmed Oscar, can muster the strength to get through our companies transition to the cloud, I repeated to myself while listening to this song over and over again. 



Influential Irene and I were "cube-mates", I began to share some of my thoughts with her hoping it would relieve some of my stress.  Irene, "from a technology perspective things seemed so much simpler in the late 90s and early 2000's. We all consumed and learned how to leverage software packages, institutionally installed and likely to remain in service for many years.  Admittedly the flexibility of the software tools was quite limited; however, we learned to adapt our workflow processes to those supported within the solutions provided."  Irene added "the training regiments were straightforward as well, we prepared content, delivered during a training class, and monitored results."



So, Oscar, continued Irene, "why are you so anxious?" The question was so simple yet Oscar was struggling to put together a response. Initially Oscar began to realize the silliness of his anxiety, heck this is just a different software system, it serves the same function, why am I getting so upset?  I just need to "rise to the challenge" as I hummed the song now burned into my prefrontal cortex.  I have it Irene, proclaimed Oscar; "the difference is the paths we have to take are now much greater than they were in the past". For instance, when I come up to T intersection and two choices are available, left or right. Yet this cloud-based solution is more like a city center where I can drive in one spoke and be presented with 15 alternate routes. The choices are so robust that I struggle with where to start as in the past these decisions were made on my behalf.



Irene, who was responsible for training in the organization, transitioned quickly through two emotions; enlightenment and concern. Enlightenment as she agreed with Oscars response and concern as the traditional training approaches for software packages would not work in delivering cloud-based solutions. The same core elements for adoption had to be in place, the user had to resolve to use the tool, and the leadership had to provide clear expectations. But it was more than that, company level training needed to cover how to get to the toolset, individual and team coaching would position the software as a benefit and not just another distraction. Time would be spent understanding the natural work habits of an individual and suggesting a path to productivity. The real beauty, thought Irene, was the flexibility of a standard platform which could be personalized, without customization or compromise of corporate objectives, to each person.



It is not hard to find articles talking about digital transformation yet very few speak to the need for digital coaching. Providing a one-size-fits-all approach will likely yield the same or even reduced use of tools as the user will never think to stretch outside of their comfort zones.  If the objective is to enrich the user's experience with this transition, you will have to develop digital coaching approaches.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking AI (artifical intelligence)

You're talking but I can't hear you.   Everyone can certainly understand this condition; the "Peanuts" parents who sounded exactly like your own, your significant other while you watch your favorite game on TV, or most importantly a work colleague or partner which you are attempting to communicate a thought or vision.   All of these, and many other examples, have plagued our organizations long past the childhood game of telephone (passing your words to another, and on to another, etc.).   So what?   What has changed?   Besides the velocity of products hitting the market, the requirements that we have for our business now needs to be interpreted by data scientists, yet another abstraction layer from the field conditions.   Think about this example; TODAY :   we often think in binary terms, if "x" happens do "y" …   take a sales person seeking potential leads by searching a system for the last time we made contact TOMMOR...

months to aquire, moments to lose

It is just hard to imagine that one of the most common reasons maintenance contracts are lost is because people don't show up and don't pay attention to the details.   In many cases maintenance is an investment to keep the life of your asset running for a protracted period of time. However the length on many maintenance contracts is not even close to the life expectancy of that equipment, so if you don't really have any idea what maintenance is being performed then how do you really know if it's being done to your specification? Thus, it really boils down to business elements, assuming that you are actually performing the work, our focus needs to be on how you are differentiated. Let's take a look at a couple of the most common business-related reasons why people lose maintenance contracts. Not showing up ; managing contracts can be complicated between the sites, number of assets, and the frequencies at which items need to be maintained, can a...

is seeing comprehending?

Oh yeah, visual inspections are why God gave us eyes.   There is not a single machine learning, IoT, computerized environment that can match the skills a human's brain can assess and deliver based on visual feedback. The trick is making sure that the person connected to those eyeballs actually knows what they are looking for!   Face it, aren't the best workers those that can recognize an issue long before it becomes a problem? So instead, is the challenge really not that they can visually see, but instead that they can comprehend and correlate potential challenges? While we have many different definitions for "wisdom" in context of this topic, I think about it as those individuals which have had the most experience, both good and bad. Coincidentally I am a firm believer that the best service people are those that make the most frequent mistakes. When I was in the field I had lots of experience screwing things up. The difference is that I would always check and tri...