Skip to main content

months to aquire, moments to lose


It is just hard to imagine that one of the most common reasons maintenance contracts are lost is because people don't show up and don't pay attention to the details.  In many cases maintenance is an investment to keep the life of your asset running for a protracted period of time. However the length on many maintenance contracts is not even close to the life expectancy of that equipment, so if you don't really have any idea what maintenance is being performed then how do you really know if it's being done to your specification? Thus, it really boils down to business elements, assuming that you are actually performing the work, our focus needs to be on how you are differentiated.



Let's take a look at a couple of the most common business-related reasons why people lose maintenance contracts.

  1. Not showing up; managing contracts can be complicated between the sites, number of assets, and the frequencies at which items need to be maintained, can all add up to a scheduling nightmare.  Even if everything is firing on all cylinders a problem can still exist related to unscheduled activity deferring scheduled activity depending upon the depth of your workforce. There is light at the end of this tunnel, with the cost dropping significantly on IoT, we will see the time in the not so distant future when the equipment is dictating its maintenance schedule. The challenge of course will be interpreting this information and making it as effective a process as possible.
  2. The second most common reason for losing maintenance contracts is really wrapped around all of the little things. To mention a few examples; make sure that you see Sally when you arrive, don't park in front of the building, we can only maintain this equipment and a.m. hours. While these little idiosyncrasies of a site or a client seem insignificant by themselves when they are grouped together they can create the perception with the client that you just don't care.  Competitively priced markets raise the mark and you should be aware of everything that makes that client happy and strive to satisfy even the littlest of requests.  Imagine alerting a worker via GPS when they arrive on-site of these idiosyncrasies.



So in many instances, losing a maintenance contract has little to do with the way that you are performing maintenance, instead it has to do with the way that you are approaching and managing your business. Paying closer attention to the details and leveraging emerging technologies you should be a master at retaining the lifeblood of any service business.



-----

Next post:  where is customer service?

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Digital distance

As influential Irene entered the dispatch department this hot July afternoon all that she heard was the tapping of keyboards.   The energy felt like a controlled, almost clinical environment.   It wasn't that many years ago when the sense of chaos, wrapped in genuine human concern for our clients, filled the room with a much different feeling.   Could it be that our ambitions to become more efficient, by leveraging technology has simply created a reason for us not to communicate verbally with one another?    Hasn't the idea all along been centered around our ability to spend more time with our customers? Making each and every one of them feel as if they are our most important client?   Certainly I'm not suggesting we go back to big chief tablets and number two pencils.   Yet, we need to reflect and strike a balance between digitization and delivery. By pure coincidence, avid Andy was composing a memo attempting to give his opinion, without tr...