Skip to main content

Size matters


Could it be that "best intentions" would not be enough to chip through the hardened exterior of this organizations habits, thought Frustrated Frank.  As the digital transformation honeymoon period slipped into the rear-view mirror, the burden of change seemed to settle into place. 



Frank, it is no longer about the tools, instead it is each person's rationalization of why these tools will make them stronger; habits are challenging, continued Andy.  On one hand, if it works why fix it, and the other hand growth requires continuous innovation.  The organizational structure has an impact, flat organizations require compelling reasons to change.  For instance, significant pain points within the business resulting in lost revenue, market or corporate dictated edicts.  Without these, change lacks a sense of urgency and is at the discretion of the local management, the larger the operation, the greater the number of management layers, the higher probability of lackluster adoption.



Often, larger branches; flush with sales and work are focused acutely on execution and elect to defer change.  Whereas the smaller branches are always seeking an edge, they do not have the momentum of the larger branch.  Thus, adoption and use of new tools are welcomed as clear differentiators, as opposed to perceived distractors.  The approach may also be different; those with high work volume may not want to see and assess options, instead simply receive training; small branches may want a stronger “consultative” approach, plant the seed and help it grow.  These behaviors may also be observed from department to department within a branch.  In 2018, the people component is the largest contributor or detractor influencing successful adoption.  Thanks, said Frank, your perspectives have provided me with fresh ideas.



Innovation flourishes in communities were individuals are encouraged to challenge the norm and direction.  At what point is it appropriate to say, we have chosen a path and will stick with it, where is the balance between empowerment and leadership?  Managing polarization and moving beyond the rhetorical simplicity of prioritizing one value over all others or a false-choice narrative that freezes action-oriented debate into prolonged indecision.  You are either on the gas or the brakes, winning has no room for those simply coasting.  How are you driving sustainable adoption?



-----

Next post:  assess me?

Thoughts?  feel free to leave replies or direct message

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworkersolutions.com

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Who owns the data?

Finally the capital budget allows you to replace some very old equipment.    You can't open a trade magazine without seeing the latest news regarding the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).   Lucky for you the equipment manufacturers are offering an IIoT ready solution packaged with your equipment.   Suddenly your enthusiasm turns to confusion as you review the details of the quote.   What the hell is that subscription fee?   Isn't this equipment mine; lock, stock and barrel?   You mean to tell me that I need to pay the manufacturer, every month,   to give me the luxury of accessing data produced by the equipment I just purchased?   The only explanation has to be new math, at least as a child this is what my parents told me when I asked hard to answer questions. It's amazing how history repeats itself, we are starting to see manufacturer specific data languages appearing in their "smart" equipment.   Didn't we learn our lesson ...