Skip to main content

Size matters


Could it be that "best intentions" would not be enough to chip through the hardened exterior of this organizations habits, thought Frustrated Frank.  As the digital transformation honeymoon period slipped into the rear-view mirror, the burden of change seemed to settle into place. 



Frank, it is no longer about the tools, instead it is each person's rationalization of why these tools will make them stronger; habits are challenging, continued Andy.  On one hand, if it works why fix it, and the other hand growth requires continuous innovation.  The organizational structure has an impact, flat organizations require compelling reasons to change.  For instance, significant pain points within the business resulting in lost revenue, market or corporate dictated edicts.  Without these, change lacks a sense of urgency and is at the discretion of the local management, the larger the operation, the greater the number of management layers, the higher probability of lackluster adoption.



Often, larger branches; flush with sales and work are focused acutely on execution and elect to defer change.  Whereas the smaller branches are always seeking an edge, they do not have the momentum of the larger branch.  Thus, adoption and use of new tools are welcomed as clear differentiators, as opposed to perceived distractors.  The approach may also be different; those with high work volume may not want to see and assess options, instead simply receive training; small branches may want a stronger “consultative” approach, plant the seed and help it grow.  These behaviors may also be observed from department to department within a branch.  In 2018, the people component is the largest contributor or detractor influencing successful adoption.  Thanks, said Frank, your perspectives have provided me with fresh ideas.



Innovation flourishes in communities were individuals are encouraged to challenge the norm and direction.  At what point is it appropriate to say, we have chosen a path and will stick with it, where is the balance between empowerment and leadership?  Managing polarization and moving beyond the rhetorical simplicity of prioritizing one value over all others or a false-choice narrative that freezes action-oriented debate into prolonged indecision.  You are either on the gas or the brakes, winning has no room for those simply coasting.  How are you driving sustainable adoption?



-----

Next post:  assess me?

Thoughts?  feel free to leave replies or direct message

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworkersolutions.com

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...