Skip to main content

Deep adoption; four simple steps


The parallels between trips I made to Daqing, China two decades ago and behavioral observations today around digital transformation are surprisingly similar.  When I was last in Daqing the population was approximately 1 million.  The roads in this remote city were filled mostly with mule drawn carriages and bicycles, very few automobiles. One evening, while eating God knows what, I commented to Chung, our host and translator, "it must be difficult for people not to have automobiles".  Chung responded, it is hard to miss something that you do not know.



That's it!  Most individuals in today's enterprises may only use a few pieces of technology; a transactional system (CRM, Accounting, Work order management), a communication system (typically email and or a messaging service, Word, Excel, PowerPoint), and possibly a special purpose application (AutoCAD,etc.).  While I have my "broad stroke paintbrush" in hand we might as well throw out that odds are people are using a small percentage of the functionality provided within any of the aforementioned tools.



We circle back to the parallels from China, if your employees are only familiar with email and Word for instance, it is next to impossible for most to contemplate what else is possible.  As a result you may move to "the cloud" and feel pretty good about yourself, look how modern I am... Unfortunately the reality may be that you are using these new tools in exactly the same manner as before, stymied by your past experience. 



Your approach, must be completely different. If you have read any of my previous posts you will see a theme around answering the question "why".  Over the last few years I find myself coming back to these four steps in my never ending search for complete adoption, they are:



  1. technical blocking and tackling | the first step, as you may imagine, is getting folks into the cloud. Many tools exist to help you and for the most part you need very little IT expertise
  2. laser focus | many people, even today within an enterprise, are skeptical of cloud technologies. Start with one or two applications from your platform, for instance you might start with email and messaging. Over time you will build confidence and pave the way for introducing new tools (many of which you are already paying for)
  3. digital dependency | slowly deploy core organizational functions from within your cloud platform. For instance, if the majority of your population requires a purchase order number, which you may have been handling on a shared network drive in Excel, move it over to your platform as a tool focusing on convenience and automation
  4. create a craving for transformation | we are now on the highway and looking for a higher gear as your community gets comfortable with the tools at their disposal. You will know you have arrived at your destination when folks begin to ask the question "I'm sure it can do XYZ, can you point me in the right direction".  I have found that showing solutions based on work conditions helps spark creativity in your users



Challenge your organization to answer this question, have you replaced your employees Schwinn bicycles with a modern Ford F150 and discovered they only drive on bike paths?



-----

Next post:  your face, our face

Thoughts?  feel free to leave replies or direct message

See all "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworkersolutions.com

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking AI (artifical intelligence)

You're talking but I can't hear you.   Everyone can certainly understand this condition; the "Peanuts" parents who sounded exactly like your own, your significant other while you watch your favorite game on TV, or most importantly a work colleague or partner which you are attempting to communicate a thought or vision.   All of these, and many other examples, have plagued our organizations long past the childhood game of telephone (passing your words to another, and on to another, etc.).   So what?   What has changed?   Besides the velocity of products hitting the market, the requirements that we have for our business now needs to be interpreted by data scientists, yet another abstraction layer from the field conditions.   Think about this example; TODAY :   we often think in binary terms, if "x" happens do "y" …   take a sales person seeking potential leads by searching a system for the last time we made contact TOMMOR...

months to aquire, moments to lose

It is just hard to imagine that one of the most common reasons maintenance contracts are lost is because people don't show up and don't pay attention to the details.   In many cases maintenance is an investment to keep the life of your asset running for a protracted period of time. However the length on many maintenance contracts is not even close to the life expectancy of that equipment, so if you don't really have any idea what maintenance is being performed then how do you really know if it's being done to your specification? Thus, it really boils down to business elements, assuming that you are actually performing the work, our focus needs to be on how you are differentiated. Let's take a look at a couple of the most common business-related reasons why people lose maintenance contracts. Not showing up ; managing contracts can be complicated between the sites, number of assets, and the frequencies at which items need to be maintained, can a...

is seeing comprehending?

Oh yeah, visual inspections are why God gave us eyes.   There is not a single machine learning, IoT, computerized environment that can match the skills a human's brain can assess and deliver based on visual feedback. The trick is making sure that the person connected to those eyeballs actually knows what they are looking for!   Face it, aren't the best workers those that can recognize an issue long before it becomes a problem? So instead, is the challenge really not that they can visually see, but instead that they can comprehend and correlate potential challenges? While we have many different definitions for "wisdom" in context of this topic, I think about it as those individuals which have had the most experience, both good and bad. Coincidentally I am a firm believer that the best service people are those that make the most frequent mistakes. When I was in the field I had lots of experience screwing things up. The difference is that I would always check and tri...