Skip to main content

Science and Service | is AI cultural?

Irene was beaming with pride this morning as she shared the conversation last night with her daughter Izzy. One of Izzy's college courses was to conduct research based on a handful of Harvard business studies. At a high level these studies were comparing organizations from three different approaches; keep doing what they're doing, except change but only incrementally, focus on changing in industry by deliberately disrupting the status quo.
People were gathering as Irene began to play back the conversation. Mom, exclaimed Izzy, after listening to each bit of explanation on the three Harvard studies it was quite difficult to make a decision on which one was correct. The first example; "leave the business alone we are making money" made some excellent points, continued Izzy, however I really felt as though the rationale had much stronger value in the past and was not preparing organizations for our high velocity changing future. The second use case, "incremental change, slow and steady wins the race" certainly has its merits. Unfortunately, it was easy to see that the reason for this approach had more to do with other factors such as bonuses and fear. Izzy paused for a minute and I couldn't tell what direction she was going to head, just then she burst out, "the third option of going all in and doing something very different was the most exciting for me". Irene remembered the goosebumps as she listened to the excitement in Izzy's voice.
Irene continued to share Izzy's story; our professor advised us to make sure that we looked at each of these three examples objectively, but that seemed next to impossible as the first two were just copout's. It was the final approach that seemed to make the most sense. Hey, if we were not surrounded by the convergence of sensors, data sciences, algorithms, and the ability to mash information up from multiple sources, maybe the other two had some merit. That simply was not the case in 2018. We have the opportunity to take advantage of information, leverage the science around what we were doing, and simply work smarter. There was no stopping Izzy now as she had incredible momentum, and as she continued explaining why science had to play a role for the business to survive, Irene was grinning from ear to ear. What a perfect moment.
The room was silent as Irene's work associates hung on every word, vicariously enjoying the happiness Irene exuded from every ounce of her being. It wasn't just the story about Izzy and how others in the room had reflected or hoped to be able to share a story about their child one day, instead the room was filled with optimism that a generation entering the work force might not be saddled with the constraints that hold us back when contemplating innovation. We have all had conversations about green, sustainability, predictive modeling, and even some with prescriptive modeling. None of these are trivial tasks and the mass amount of effort to take your business from a traditional to a science-based environment takes one dose of technology and four doses of cultural change. IIoT systems will act like modern networks, socializing connected product data to foster unparalleled knowledge and collaboration. When I see the future, summarized Irene, the reality that no product or asset will be an island, fills me with energy to keep pushing forward.
-----
Next post: magnificent models
Thoughts? feel free to leave replies or direct message
See all "last mile worker" posts here: http://lastmileworkersolutions.com
-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is custom software in 2019 spelled EGO?

I still struggle , as do many, with the rationalization between building software and buying software. Microsoft Excel , likely one of the most widely recognized packaged software applications, was released over 30 years ago . My guess is not many people would consider building a custom piece of software which performs math and other worksheet related tasks. While this is an obvious example, it highlights an important factor for many in deciding between custom and configurable software solutions . Fact is, everybody understands how Microsoft Excel works. Let's mix it up a bit and add the opinions that you have regarding what makes your approach to business so special.   The things that you do, in an industry, which are totally unique to your competitors.   This is where it gets a bit murky, we must tease out the transactional components from the value add aspects of software.   For instance, you use a staffing system to help find, manage, and retain internal and external

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed prope

Close more sales, of course!

Avid Andy sits comfortably with fingers on his temples struggling to determine ways in which connected systems, combined with varied levels of AI, can make his service company money.   Seems the harder he concentrates on the topic, the more he churns out insipid, shallow ideas.   If his clients, and even Reluctant Ruth, believe that IoT is the future, why is it so damn hard to put numbers to these investments?   Influential Irene is quick to point out a few considerations, unfortunately they are all related to adding cost to PM's; a proposition which could negatively impact the lifeblood of the organization (annuity stream) and would likely be a push, or even a loss, to existing contracts.   Assuming that we could flip the majority of our contracts to full-risk, combined with relevant and actionable information from assets in the field, we may be able to reduce cost for the client and increase our margins.   Even Overwhelmed Oscar seemed to be in agreement with this strategy.