Skip to main content

Science and Service | is AI cultural?

Irene was beaming with pride this morning as she shared the conversation last night with her daughter Izzy. One of Izzy's college courses was to conduct research based on a handful of Harvard business studies. At a high level these studies were comparing organizations from three different approaches; keep doing what they're doing, except change but only incrementally, focus on changing in industry by deliberately disrupting the status quo.
People were gathering as Irene began to play back the conversation. Mom, exclaimed Izzy, after listening to each bit of explanation on the three Harvard studies it was quite difficult to make a decision on which one was correct. The first example; "leave the business alone we are making money" made some excellent points, continued Izzy, however I really felt as though the rationale had much stronger value in the past and was not preparing organizations for our high velocity changing future. The second use case, "incremental change, slow and steady wins the race" certainly has its merits. Unfortunately, it was easy to see that the reason for this approach had more to do with other factors such as bonuses and fear. Izzy paused for a minute and I couldn't tell what direction she was going to head, just then she burst out, "the third option of going all in and doing something very different was the most exciting for me". Irene remembered the goosebumps as she listened to the excitement in Izzy's voice.
Irene continued to share Izzy's story; our professor advised us to make sure that we looked at each of these three examples objectively, but that seemed next to impossible as the first two were just copout's. It was the final approach that seemed to make the most sense. Hey, if we were not surrounded by the convergence of sensors, data sciences, algorithms, and the ability to mash information up from multiple sources, maybe the other two had some merit. That simply was not the case in 2018. We have the opportunity to take advantage of information, leverage the science around what we were doing, and simply work smarter. There was no stopping Izzy now as she had incredible momentum, and as she continued explaining why science had to play a role for the business to survive, Irene was grinning from ear to ear. What a perfect moment.
The room was silent as Irene's work associates hung on every word, vicariously enjoying the happiness Irene exuded from every ounce of her being. It wasn't just the story about Izzy and how others in the room had reflected or hoped to be able to share a story about their child one day, instead the room was filled with optimism that a generation entering the work force might not be saddled with the constraints that hold us back when contemplating innovation. We have all had conversations about green, sustainability, predictive modeling, and even some with prescriptive modeling. None of these are trivial tasks and the mass amount of effort to take your business from a traditional to a science-based environment takes one dose of technology and four doses of cultural change. IIoT systems will act like modern networks, socializing connected product data to foster unparalleled knowledge and collaboration. When I see the future, summarized Irene, the reality that no product or asset will be an island, fills me with energy to keep pushing forward.
-----
Next post: magnificent models
Thoughts? feel free to leave replies or direct message
See all "last mile worker" posts here: http://lastmileworkersolutions.com
-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed...

jumper wire, really?

Okay already, do I have to say it?   Are you really that insecure?   Avid Andy's mind began to flashback; jumping the safeties because you did not understand how to read a schematic, manually forcing the new-fangled VFD at 60hz since the "last system" never changed speed, blaming that new magnetic compressor for the lack of cooling in the building (due to its size) ... by the way where do I check the oil?   Each one of these, and there are countless other examples, have the same root issue:   humans.   You can see the frustration flood over Andy's face, very similar to that of Charlie Brown as he endured tireless teasing from Snoopy.   It seems convenient, especially as time causes our opinions to become increasingly cynical, to respond with "they just don't give a crap".   Reluctant Ruth, the epitome of cynicism,   shouts out, "possibly you should hold a mirror up to yourself, this issue has stood the test of time, it squarely lies on the sh...