Skip to main content

Your face; our face | company perception is a narrow view


Top promoter score, my ass proclaimed Anal Arnold;  explain to me why Chaotic Chris, who basically looks like an adult version of Pig Pen, consistently gets the highest overall scores where as Kempt Ken gets mediocre scores from his clients.  Admittedly, while Chris looks like he just took a bath in bong water, his customers absolutely love him.  Ken on the other hand, is a bit of an arrogant ass and turns off even the most accepting of customers. 

Legendary Lee had always rambled on about how your company is always only as good as the employee which touches the customer.  Think about the bank teller, many financial institutions are similar; however, most people will go to banks where they like the tellers (your face, our face).  As organizations get larger and workers are spread far and wide, the influence we have on our key "money makers" dwindles.  "That is all good and well" said Arnold, but each individual is different and they own their attitudes.   You are partially correct Arnold responded Lee, we can help pave the road to a good experience for the field worker.  Sincere efforts need to be implemented by many within the organization focusing on:

  • Choice. how choice empowers people to make the right decisions and generates the proper attitude
  • Control, when the technician is in control of their own schedule in the field, magical things can happen. Is the business willing to relinquish this past tradition
  • Convergence, do they have the information when they arrive at site, idiosyncrasies and how to get to equipment. Nothing worse than putting the field worker in a no-win situation

Certainly these are logical, yet in some situations not very practical, stated Arnold.  Consider the all-paper company who really does not have the insights to allow them to push more decisions to the field.  How do they know that the worker is always making decisions for the company and not themselves.  Techno Tim, who had been listening all along, offered a slightly different perspective.  While in agreement; Tim suggested that choice, control and convergence are feasible when technology provides the transparency required to insure everyone is in cadence with one another.  Choice without boundaries can create its' own type of chaos.  Control devoid of performance measurement will likely result in individual priorities over organizational priority.  Convergence of knowledge is next to impossible without some form of digital transformation.

The tool, while important, is not the critical path.  You must re-imagine your organization and put the tools in place to make sure that the individuals touching your clients are always compelled to put their best foot forward.  If you believe that the customer experience takes a back seat to performance, than I encourage you to ask yourself how Apple, which has only incrementally improved their product since the passing of Steve Jobs, still finds themselves in a successful position.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...
Post a Comment
Read more

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Who owns the data?

Finally the capital budget allows you to replace some very old equipment.    You can't open a trade magazine without seeing the latest news regarding the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).   Lucky for you the equipment manufacturers are offering an IIoT ready solution packaged with your equipment.   Suddenly your enthusiasm turns to confusion as you review the details of the quote.   What the hell is that subscription fee?   Isn't this equipment mine; lock, stock and barrel?   You mean to tell me that I need to pay the manufacturer, every month,   to give me the luxury of accessing data produced by the equipment I just purchased?   The only explanation has to be new math, at least as a child this is what my parents told me when I asked hard to answer questions. It's amazing how history repeats itself, we are starting to see manufacturer specific data languages appearing in their "smart" equipment.   Didn't we learn our lesson ...
Post a Comment
Read more