Skip to main content

Is Innovation Impossible?


Ingenious Igor seemed to be perplexed when Avid Andy asked, "Igor how would you describe Innovation".  Andy, started Igor in a crackling voice, Innovation is anything where the output causes a shift in direction.  You see Andy, many assume that change and innovation are synonyms, that is not the case.  Instead, continued Igor, Innovation is the whole package; creative and often disruptive design, deliberate deployment, and absolute adoption.  After a pregnant pause Igor blurted out, Innovation is a tall order and success is only realized after the "I believe button" changes to an "I can't live without" admission by naysayers and supporters alike.  Depending upon the directional impact and breadth of the innovation, the transformation could take weeks, months, or years.



Inspiring innovation across the organization is different for everyone; however, a few thoughts may help get you started:



  • Undisputable destination | no surprise for anyone reading my past posts, you absolutely must answer the question of why.  So many times we focus on what and even how, with innovation these focal points will generally over complicate the objective.  Speaking from personal experience, on more than one occasion, starting a journey without a crystal clear destination will find you wandering aimlessly, burning resources, credibility and support.  Spend time understanding the importance of your innovation for the practitioner and the business.
  • Reserved socialization | timing is EVERYTHING.  A very delicate balance happens early on in the idea gestation phase.  If you are introducing a concept which is highly disruptive or WAY outside of the box, the release of information to others outside of the core team will need to be strategic.  Be careful as you need to get far enough for others to see your vision; however, not so far that others do not feel part of the solution.  Be sincere, you must believe if you expect others to get on board, trust and passion are essential.
  • Top down, bottom up |  this is very hard to answer as it depends on the leadership, their style, operating locations, past performance.  Innovation has never occurred, or a misunderstanding that the last Accounting upgrade was innovative,  absolutely top down.  Ideation meetings, free flowing and sharing of ideas, bottoms up is effective (as these types of organizations are generally flat).  My experience has shown that a good mix of top down and bottom up is the best approach.



As with many things in business, an Innovation leader must have a solid IQ and a strong EQ (emotional quotient).  I would add, in the era of digital transformation, that your DQ (digital quotient), that's right I just made the last one up, must be accomplished.  Igor slapped Andy on the shoulder and said, after work let's discuss this more over a few shots of Vodka.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking AI (artifical intelligence)

You're talking but I can't hear you.   Everyone can certainly understand this condition; the "Peanuts" parents who sounded exactly like your own, your significant other while you watch your favorite game on TV, or most importantly a work colleague or partner which you are attempting to communicate a thought or vision.   All of these, and many other examples, have plagued our organizations long past the childhood game of telephone (passing your words to another, and on to another, etc.).   So what?   What has changed?   Besides the velocity of products hitting the market, the requirements that we have for our business now needs to be interpreted by data scientists, yet another abstraction layer from the field conditions.   Think about this example; TODAY :   we often think in binary terms, if "x" happens do "y" …   take a sales person seeking potential leads by searching a system for the last time we made contact TOMMOR...
Post a Comment
Read more

months to aquire, moments to lose

It is just hard to imagine that one of the most common reasons maintenance contracts are lost is because people don't show up and don't pay attention to the details.   In many cases maintenance is an investment to keep the life of your asset running for a protracted period of time. However the length on many maintenance contracts is not even close to the life expectancy of that equipment, so if you don't really have any idea what maintenance is being performed then how do you really know if it's being done to your specification? Thus, it really boils down to business elements, assuming that you are actually performing the work, our focus needs to be on how you are differentiated. Let's take a look at a couple of the most common business-related reasons why people lose maintenance contracts. Not showing up ; managing contracts can be complicated between the sites, number of assets, and the frequencies at which items need to be maintained, can a...
Post a Comment
Read more

is seeing comprehending?

Oh yeah, visual inspections are why God gave us eyes.   There is not a single machine learning, IoT, computerized environment that can match the skills a human's brain can assess and deliver based on visual feedback. The trick is making sure that the person connected to those eyeballs actually knows what they are looking for!   Face it, aren't the best workers those that can recognize an issue long before it becomes a problem? So instead, is the challenge really not that they can visually see, but instead that they can comprehend and correlate potential challenges? While we have many different definitions for "wisdom" in context of this topic, I think about it as those individuals which have had the most experience, both good and bad. Coincidentally I am a firm believer that the best service people are those that make the most frequent mistakes. When I was in the field I had lots of experience screwing things up. The difference is that I would always check and tri...
Post a Comment
Read more