Skip to main content

Are dispatchers creating any value?


How is it that we have run service businesses for years with relegating control of the majority of revenue generators to a reasonably fluid position?  When you think about the traditional dispatcher / scheduler (coordinator) these positions may be non-career based workers or "stepping stones" to another position.  Yet the movement, allocation, scheduling, favoritism (unfortunate), subjective points of reference, of your valuable field workers is dumped in their laps.  Sure, checks and balances exist within many organizations with supervisors, service and ops managers, etc. however, the moment to moment ground battle is led by these front line workers.  Please make no mistake, these comments are not focused on the individuals performing these often difficult jobs, instead they are aimed directly at the archaic process, come on folks it is 2016!



Unfortunately, like many things stuck between the old fashioned approach and the anticipation of things to come, attempts have been made to "optimize" these steps within the operation.  In many cases the solution was increasing the worker to dispatcher/scheduler ratios, only exasperating an already very flawed approach.  We have inadvertently forced these coordinators to spend an inordinate amount of time on the phone with the workers and not the customers!  Crazy, right?  Instead consider leveraging web service based data to contribute into logical engines to assist in the selection of the best possible worker, objective points of measurement designed to increase productivity and enhance customer value.  I encourage you to focus on methods which compel behavioral change and not just add logistics data on top of a transactional work order management system.  Of course much easier said than done; the tools are available and can turn this random process into predicable and profit driving action.  The best news is that your dispatchers / schedulers can once again serve as your best client advocates while you regain the ability to flex to your business demands in a proactive way. 



Next post:  blending internal and external labor is great; however, can you trust the subcontractor?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Who owns the data?

Finally the capital budget allows you to replace some very old equipment.    You can't open a trade magazine without seeing the latest news regarding the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).   Lucky for you the equipment manufacturers are offering an IIoT ready solution packaged with your equipment.   Suddenly your enthusiasm turns to confusion as you review the details of the quote.   What the hell is that subscription fee?   Isn't this equipment mine; lock, stock and barrel?   You mean to tell me that I need to pay the manufacturer, every month,   to give me the luxury of accessing data produced by the equipment I just purchased?   The only explanation has to be new math, at least as a child this is what my parents told me when I asked hard to answer questions. It's amazing how history repeats itself, we are starting to see manufacturer specific data languages appearing in their "smart" equipment.   Didn't we learn our lesson ...