Skip to main content

focus on your annuity base, come on man..


Stick with what you know and repeat often. When I think about maintenance, regardless of type of contract, I think about consistency, consistency, consistency. The motivation behind writing this post is to encourage you to either build or bolster your existing maintenance base, here are some things to consider:

  • most maintenance contracts should yield between 5% and 7% additional revenue above and beyond the contract value.  Building trust between you and your clients organization will result in additional service activity.
  • Full risk contracts, or those where you were charging one flat amount and taking all of the financial risk, can be profitable.  Watch out for the age of the equipment, service call track record, and customer disposition
    • pull-through opportunities can be constrained with full risk contracts unless the scope of work is very specific. This can be a bit of a slippery slope. The perception of a customer signing up for a full risk contract is not going to want to argue with you about what is in and out of scope.
  • maintenance contracts on buildings with brand-new equipment are generally not as profitable regarding pull-through opportunity as the equipment will likely run trouble-free for many years.
  • equipment in the center third of its life are really perfect for full risk and negotiated rate maintenance contracts
  • those assets in the last third of life expectancy should be approached very carefully when pricing maintenance contracts and setting expectations with your customers
  • as mentioned in previous posts, crew mix is CRITICAL.  Make sure you are applying the appropriate amount of labor (and cost) to maintenance tasks.  DO NOT be afraid to consider outsourcing low value elements of your contracts to subs.



The simple fact is you need an annuity-based model in order to continue growing your company. It is time, right now, as you are thinking about your next year's business plans, to commit to an increase in effort towards building or adding to your existing maintenance portfolio. This is not easy work, but it will yield peace of mind and a solid financial backbone for your organization and your employees.



What are your thoughts?



-----

Next post:  is the "big picture" important?

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Who owns the data?

Finally the capital budget allows you to replace some very old equipment.    You can't open a trade magazine without seeing the latest news regarding the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).   Lucky for you the equipment manufacturers are offering an IIoT ready solution packaged with your equipment.   Suddenly your enthusiasm turns to confusion as you review the details of the quote.   What the hell is that subscription fee?   Isn't this equipment mine; lock, stock and barrel?   You mean to tell me that I need to pay the manufacturer, every month,   to give me the luxury of accessing data produced by the equipment I just purchased?   The only explanation has to be new math, at least as a child this is what my parents told me when I asked hard to answer questions. It's amazing how history repeats itself, we are starting to see manufacturer specific data languages appearing in their "smart" equipment.   Didn't we learn our lesson ...