Skip to main content

Keep you safe, really?


The title of this post is absolutely ludicrous. Certainly most of you are scoffing at the idea that we would even bring this topic up, that is the topic of safety. Are you the one saying, "hey I already provide safety for my workers". One of the most ridiculous parts of this title and subject is the interpretation of what providing safety is all about. We have all heard the slogans, safety is job one, safety is our responsibility, so many times in so many companies it is simply lip service. Has safety in your organization devolved similar to training, you are basically providing whatever is required to keep you "legal" and in compliance? If so, shame on you.



In my mind safety it is not about the OSHA 10 course or the video on slips trips and falls, instead it is about the company and its culture. Down deep inside all of us, forgetting about the influence that business and margins may have on some of our decisions, we want to keep everybody safe. Unfortunately sometimes our desires to keep folks safe are at cross purposes with the required safety and costs.  Certainly delivering the appropriate safety is a requirement, yet if you really want a safe environment, promote it from every fiber of your being.



The work environment has a lot to do with safety as well, are you putting folks inadvertently in unsafe conditions? Are you so callused or aggressive in discipline with your employees that they are going to "stick it to the man" and drive your recordable incidents and insurance mod rates through the roof? In my experience people really do want to do the right thing we just need to be sincere in our approach and expectations of a safe working environment. When your workers truly believe that their safety is at the center of your risk-based initiatives you will get them on board.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...