Skip to main content

... you can trust me


So what was the turning point when we let fear and our egos influence the level of service that we are providing our clients? How many times have you heard in the service business, we can't use that subcontractor as they will poach the work from us. What about those that say "hey my real value statement to our client is that we self-perform all of the work". Well that is just ridiculous. If service people are truly obsequious hoop jumpers then when did either of these emotions, sometimes justified, impact the way that we choose to deliver value to our clients?  Wouldn't the better approach be to look at the client, find out what they need and do every damn thing that we can in our power to satisfy their requests? If I am a home healthcare person but I don't do home care services or oxygen tank refills shouldn't I recommend people to my client to make sure that they are getting everything they need? Without fear of losing work to somebody else.



The fact  of that the matter is none of us know everything. Those businesses that focus on their core competencies, the things that they just nail, are the ones which are most successful. The trick is just figuring out who is good at what. For years, and even to this day, we  align individuals dictated by their job role to general work areas. Enough is enough let's start qualifying people by the objective, what we need them to accomplish all the way down to the activity. It is only then that we can each be experts in our own ways and leverage one another to provide better service for our clients.  I'm certainly not suggesting we all get in a circle and sing Kumbaya.  Focusing keenly on what our client needs will build trust and the end result will be heightened service levels, increased productivity and higher profitability.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...
Post a Comment
Read more

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed...
Post a Comment
Read more

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...
Post a Comment
Read more