Skip to main content

... you can trust me


So what was the turning point when we let fear and our egos influence the level of service that we are providing our clients? How many times have you heard in the service business, we can't use that subcontractor as they will poach the work from us. What about those that say "hey my real value statement to our client is that we self-perform all of the work". Well that is just ridiculous. If service people are truly obsequious hoop jumpers then when did either of these emotions, sometimes justified, impact the way that we choose to deliver value to our clients?  Wouldn't the better approach be to look at the client, find out what they need and do every damn thing that we can in our power to satisfy their requests? If I am a home healthcare person but I don't do home care services or oxygen tank refills shouldn't I recommend people to my client to make sure that they are getting everything they need? Without fear of losing work to somebody else.



The fact  of that the matter is none of us know everything. Those businesses that focus on their core competencies, the things that they just nail, are the ones which are most successful. The trick is just figuring out who is good at what. For years, and even to this day, we  align individuals dictated by their job role to general work areas. Enough is enough let's start qualifying people by the objective, what we need them to accomplish all the way down to the activity. It is only then that we can each be experts in our own ways and leverage one another to provide better service for our clients.  I'm certainly not suggesting we all get in a circle and sing Kumbaya.  Focusing keenly on what our client needs will build trust and the end result will be heightened service levels, increased productivity and higher profitability.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed...

It's the little details

As overwhelmed Oscar sits in his office, surrounded by piles of overdue work order tickets to review and material orders to procure, his heart yearns to give the customer anything they want, yet the tools at his disposal make it difficult. On this relatively ordinary day Oscar receives a phone call from a marquee customer. This new customer has multiple locations and has asked for just three pieces of information every time a person visits their sites to perform service or maintenance. Oscar gathers his thoughts as he prepares to discuss this seemingly small challenge with reluctant Ruth, the dispatcher who has been with the organization for decades, Ruth can be a bit of a curmudgeon. Oscar does appreciate the inconvenience of gathering unexpected information both for the field worker as well as the back office.   A seemingly great example of ending up between a rock and a hard place. In a world of perfect harmony where all customers, work orders, and requests are exactly...

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...