Skip to main content

Close more sales, of course!


Avid Andy sits comfortably with fingers on his temples struggling to determine ways in which connected systems, combined with varied levels of AI, can make his service company money.  Seems the harder he concentrates on the topic, the more he churns out insipid, shallow ideas.  If his clients, and even Reluctant Ruth, believe that IoT is the future, why is it so damn hard to put numbers to these investments?  Influential Irene is quick to point out a few considerations, unfortunately they are all related to adding cost to PM's; a proposition which could negatively impact the lifeblood of the organization (annuity stream) and would likely be a push, or even a loss, to existing contracts.  Assuming that we could flip the majority of our contracts to full-risk, combined with relevant and actionable information from assets in the field, we may be able to reduce cost for the client and increase our margins.  Even Overwhelmed Oscar seemed to be in agreement with this strategy.  Yet, something was still gnawing at Andy, it isn't enough and could take years to hit positive cash flow.



Instead, how about if we look at it differently, switch from an operations view to a sales view, suggested Irene.  Suddenly, Oscar begins to recall his days in the field and starts to ramble on about a "credibility spectrum", at one side you have a fresh eyed salesperson and the other a revered technician.  While both are good honest people, the client is likely to believe the technician when fielding recommendations for new or modified equipment.  A relaxed wave of confidence flows over Oscar, not often seen, as he continues and suggests machine learning (ML), just a jump up on the AI evolution scale, ML could be positioned in the middle of the credibility spectrum between sales and the technician.  You can feel the energy in the room build as both Irene, and Ruth, as if choreographed jump up and yell "close more sales, of course!".   Recommendations with elevated credibility equate to higher close rates.  Andy ponders the impact as he calculates… if my close rate increased by x % with $yyy in service, retrofit and project work, that would mean $zzz in additional revenue.  Suddenly the operational expenses of IoT based connected solutions becomes a cost of sales, could this be the answer I have been searching for?



The simple answer is, it is anyone's best guess.  We just don't have enough experience or information to see exactly how to monetize these investments; however, you know what they say:  'Practice makes Perfect".  Let's remember "IoT without monetization is simply monitoring".



Thank you,  Jim (Mesa), Brian (VSS) and Steve (CANDI), for the conversations which motivated this post.



-----

Next post:  perceiving the service professional

Thoughts?  feel free to leave replies or direct message

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworker.com

-----
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking AI (artifical intelligence)

You're talking but I can't hear you.   Everyone can certainly understand this condition; the "Peanuts" parents who sounded exactly like your own, your significant other while you watch your favorite game on TV, or most importantly a work colleague or partner which you are attempting to communicate a thought or vision.   All of these, and many other examples, have plagued our organizations long past the childhood game of telephone (passing your words to another, and on to another, etc.).   So what?   What has changed?   Besides the velocity of products hitting the market, the requirements that we have for our business now needs to be interpreted by data scientists, yet another abstraction layer from the field conditions.   Think about this example; TODAY :   we often think in binary terms, if "x" happens do "y" …   take a sales person seeking potential leads by searching a system for the last time we made contact TOMMOR...
Post a Comment
Read more

Are "mistakes" good or bad?

One of the attributes that make a great technician is the fact that they have made a lot of mistakes. Our biggest challenge is recalling those mistakes ourselves and as importantly sharing them with others on our team. Every single day we go out and fix things, many of them are routine and may not require any form of documentation or sharing; however, there are those instances where we have discovered gold. The trick is to make sure that we can learn from our mistakes in a systematic manner and have the ability to spread the information throughout our organization in a useful and relevant way. Corrective action, an integral part of a quality system, is the absolute best vehicle to put in place for your organization. Some of you may have been turned off by the words "quality system", don't worry you can still deploy a corrective culture without having to understand completely how corrective action and quality management systems work. The process is very straightf...
Post a Comment
Read more

months to aquire, moments to lose

It is just hard to imagine that one of the most common reasons maintenance contracts are lost is because people don't show up and don't pay attention to the details.   In many cases maintenance is an investment to keep the life of your asset running for a protracted period of time. However the length on many maintenance contracts is not even close to the life expectancy of that equipment, so if you don't really have any idea what maintenance is being performed then how do you really know if it's being done to your specification? Thus, it really boils down to business elements, assuming that you are actually performing the work, our focus needs to be on how you are differentiated. Let's take a look at a couple of the most common business-related reasons why people lose maintenance contracts. Not showing up ; managing contracts can be complicated between the sites, number of assets, and the frequencies at which items need to be maintained, can a...
Post a Comment
Read more