Skip to main content

Close more sales, of course!


Avid Andy sits comfortably with fingers on his temples struggling to determine ways in which connected systems, combined with varied levels of AI, can make his service company money.  Seems the harder he concentrates on the topic, the more he churns out insipid, shallow ideas.  If his clients, and even Reluctant Ruth, believe that IoT is the future, why is it so damn hard to put numbers to these investments?  Influential Irene is quick to point out a few considerations, unfortunately they are all related to adding cost to PM's; a proposition which could negatively impact the lifeblood of the organization (annuity stream) and would likely be a push, or even a loss, to existing contracts.  Assuming that we could flip the majority of our contracts to full-risk, combined with relevant and actionable information from assets in the field, we may be able to reduce cost for the client and increase our margins.  Even Overwhelmed Oscar seemed to be in agreement with this strategy.  Yet, something was still gnawing at Andy, it isn't enough and could take years to hit positive cash flow.



Instead, how about if we look at it differently, switch from an operations view to a sales view, suggested Irene.  Suddenly, Oscar begins to recall his days in the field and starts to ramble on about a "credibility spectrum", at one side you have a fresh eyed salesperson and the other a revered technician.  While both are good honest people, the client is likely to believe the technician when fielding recommendations for new or modified equipment.  A relaxed wave of confidence flows over Oscar, not often seen, as he continues and suggests machine learning (ML), just a jump up on the AI evolution scale, ML could be positioned in the middle of the credibility spectrum between sales and the technician.  You can feel the energy in the room build as both Irene, and Ruth, as if choreographed jump up and yell "close more sales, of course!".   Recommendations with elevated credibility equate to higher close rates.  Andy ponders the impact as he calculates… if my close rate increased by x % with $yyy in service, retrofit and project work, that would mean $zzz in additional revenue.  Suddenly the operational expenses of IoT based connected solutions becomes a cost of sales, could this be the answer I have been searching for?



The simple answer is, it is anyone's best guess.  We just don't have enough experience or information to see exactly how to monetize these investments; however, you know what they say:  'Practice makes Perfect".  Let's remember "IoT without monetization is simply monitoring".



Thank you,  Jim (Mesa), Brian (VSS) and Steve (CANDI), for the conversations which motivated this post.



-----

Next post:  perceiving the service professional

Thoughts?  feel free to leave replies or direct message

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworker.com

-----
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Size matters

Could it be that "best intentions" would not be enough to chip through the hardened exterior of this organizations habits, thought Frustrated Frank.   As the digital transformation honeymoon period slipped into the rear-view mirror, the burden of change seemed to settle into place.   Frank, it is no longer about the tools, instead it is each person's rationalization of why these tools will make them stronger; habits are challenging, continued Andy.   On one hand, if it works why fix it, and the other hand growth requires continuous innovation.   The organizational structure has an impact, flat organizations require compelling reasons to change.   For instance, significant pain points within the business resulting in lost revenue, market or corporate dictated edicts.   Without these, change lacks a sense of urgency and is at the discretion of the local management, the larger the operation, the greater the number of management layers, the higher pro...
Post a Comment
Read more

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...
Post a Comment
Read more