Skip to main content

Differentiate with "smarts" (not margin)


Does innovation always add value? Consider a product like "ring", some of you may be using this at your own homes as a replacement for your existing doorbell. This product integrates the function of the doorbell and adds a camera and ability to talk back and forth.  This incremental invention certainly presents different features and conveniences; but at the end, the process remains the same, someone waits outside the door for another to greet them. 



On the other end of the spectrum… you are the type of person who is simply bored with incremental innovation and is all about disruptive innovation.  Bold indeed, I like your style. Let's say that you have established a way to eliminate any form of refrigerant in air conditioning systems. Your invention has replaced refrigerant with an inert gas like krypton or helium.  As you might imagine disruptive innovation can be exciting and risky.



So when your objective is to differentiate yourself with your client, and be perceived as an innovative organization, which path should you take?  BOTH.  Innovation is not much different than sales, as you are hunting the elephant you can shoot and sustain yourself on lots of rabbits. From my experience, as with many things in life, the trick is balance.



The key to either approach is to make sure your process of vetting and qualifying innovation, for both internal and external use, gets to a "dud or diamond" answer as quickly as possible.  Spend time discussing with your organization the process which you will use to leverage innovation.  Don't be afraid to study how innovation impacts industries outside of your own, you will be amazed at the similarity of service providers.



-----

Next post:  changing workforce

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworker.com

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed...