Skip to main content

Drop your work order systems


We all felt pretty damn good about ourselves for the last couple of decades transferring our service companies to wireless work order management systems.  Think about it, what did we do? Did we simply evolve the paper ticket, from radio dispatch, to wireless distribution? How would you feel, after all of these years, that we exerted effort towards the wrong target!  Certainly these tools helped us gain efficiency and improve the perception of our customers that we were digitally savvy.  Aren't we really paid to preserve and make more energy efficient our customers assets (equipment)?  Our best intentions to streamline and create visibility was still dependent on highly subjective traffic cops (our dispatchers).  Did we move forward or just sideways and maybe even a bit back (especially when you think about the personal connections with our clients that is sometimes muted by technology).



The gap between work order and asset management systems has come to life as the result of objective points of input and the rising influence of IoT.   Somewhere in your future lies your ability to consume information from devices and assets and adjust your logic regarding if you will send a human or make a machine to machine correction. A mechanism will still need to exist to advise a fieldworker where to go and what to do, yet in a normal routine will come from an asset and not another human. Transitioning from a  work order centric environment to an asset centric environment, similar to healthcare and oil and gas, will be quite an undertaking. Start now so you can be prepared when you are ready to start consuming digital information from assets in the field. Let the asset, the one thing we are paid as service companies to protect, dictate when and where service will be required.



Best of luck



-----

Next post:  corrective actions help the service business?
-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Who owns the data?

Finally the capital budget allows you to replace some very old equipment.    You can't open a trade magazine without seeing the latest news regarding the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).   Lucky for you the equipment manufacturers are offering an IIoT ready solution packaged with your equipment.   Suddenly your enthusiasm turns to confusion as you review the details of the quote.   What the hell is that subscription fee?   Isn't this equipment mine; lock, stock and barrel?   You mean to tell me that I need to pay the manufacturer, every month,   to give me the luxury of accessing data produced by the equipment I just purchased?   The only explanation has to be new math, at least as a child this is what my parents told me when I asked hard to answer questions. It's amazing how history repeats itself, we are starting to see manufacturer specific data languages appearing in their "smart" equipment.   Didn't we learn our lesson ...