Skip to main content

Drop your work order systems


We all felt pretty damn good about ourselves for the last couple of decades transferring our service companies to wireless work order management systems.  Think about it, what did we do? Did we simply evolve the paper ticket, from radio dispatch, to wireless distribution? How would you feel, after all of these years, that we exerted effort towards the wrong target!  Certainly these tools helped us gain efficiency and improve the perception of our customers that we were digitally savvy.  Aren't we really paid to preserve and make more energy efficient our customers assets (equipment)?  Our best intentions to streamline and create visibility was still dependent on highly subjective traffic cops (our dispatchers).  Did we move forward or just sideways and maybe even a bit back (especially when you think about the personal connections with our clients that is sometimes muted by technology).



The gap between work order and asset management systems has come to life as the result of objective points of input and the rising influence of IoT.   Somewhere in your future lies your ability to consume information from devices and assets and adjust your logic regarding if you will send a human or make a machine to machine correction. A mechanism will still need to exist to advise a fieldworker where to go and what to do, yet in a normal routine will come from an asset and not another human. Transitioning from a  work order centric environment to an asset centric environment, similar to healthcare and oil and gas, will be quite an undertaking. Start now so you can be prepared when you are ready to start consuming digital information from assets in the field. Let the asset, the one thing we are paid as service companies to protect, dictate when and where service will be required.



Best of luck



-----

Next post:  corrective actions help the service business?
-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...

suggesting is NOT selling

People and companies want to buy from people that they trust.   The individual which possesses the broadest set of knowledge will gain the most credibility and as a result yield high levels of trust.   When I was in the field I definitely had the ear of the customer and for the most part discussed areas that needed improvement or replacement. At no moment was I ever, at least in my mind, selling. Instead, as I think back on those days, I believe I was simply "suggesting". Take an immediate need, add in a trusted advisor and a credible suggestion, you will most likely get a sale. However, this is not selling. From my non-salesman perspective I would sum up the following related to the sales process; sales is not a single event but instead a sequence of connection points which create a positive experience that leads to a purchase . Over the years I've been fortunate to have known many different types of salespeople in different industries and I believe that they a...