We all
felt pretty damn good about ourselves for the last couple of decades
transferring our service companies to wireless work order management
systems. Think about it, what did we do?
Did we simply evolve the paper ticket, from radio dispatch, to wireless
distribution? How would you feel, after all of these years, that we exerted
effort towards the wrong target!
Certainly these tools helped us gain efficiency and improve the
perception of our customers that we were digitally savvy. Aren't we really paid to preserve and make
more energy efficient our customers assets (equipment)? Our best intentions to streamline and create
visibility was still dependent on highly subjective traffic cops (our
dispatchers). Did we move forward or
just sideways and maybe even a bit back (especially when you think about the
personal connections with our clients that is sometimes muted by technology).
The gap
between work order and asset management systems has come to life as the result
of objective points of input and the rising influence of IoT. Somewhere in your future lies your ability
to consume information from devices and assets and adjust your logic regarding
if you will send a human or make a machine to machine correction. A mechanism
will still need to exist to advise a fieldworker where to go and what to do,
yet in a normal routine will come from an asset and not another human.
Transitioning from a work order centric
environment to an asset centric environment, similar to healthcare and oil and
gas, will be quite an undertaking. Start now so you can be prepared when you
are ready to start consuming digital information from assets in the field. Let
the asset, the one thing we are paid as service companies to protect, dictate
when and where service will be required.
Best of
luck
-----
Next
post: corrective actions help the
service business?
-----
Comments
Post a Comment