Skip to main content

Guessing or a Genius?


Imagine running a business where your customer provides you with only the most vague requirements, for instance its "too hot". What on earth are you expected to do with that information? Is the problem a failed compressor or chiller, maybe it's simply a piece of plastic sucked up against the filter bank. Of course your next question will be; who the heck do I send?  If it's a failed chiller I send my highest paid, a compressor someone a bit less expensive, and a plastic bag my lowest paid.  This riddle has plagued service companies for a ridiculous number of years, however times are changing.



Assuming that you have the stomach for it, what is the secret sauce? Here are a couple of ingredients to consider:



  1. Understand what is happening at the asset level, and not just the primary asset it's associated and supporting components as well. For instance, if we have a modern building with VAV boxes, air handlers, and a chiller, data inputs from critical points of measurement across each of these assets is required to form an opinion.
  2. A dynamic mechanism must be leveraged to update and associate specific skill levels of a field worker to discrete natures of call (example: too hot).  This can be a bit dicey as a "too hot" call for a maintenance worker may be a proficient or even expert skill set, whereas "too hot" for an experienced air conditioning worker would be a fundamental skill set.  Let's not forget industries and building types as additional variables in the logic.  Finally, how are you going to qualify initially and maintain skills inventory for your workforce? How will you even come up with the questions? A topic for another post….



It is easy to get excited about emerging tools such as IOT which allow us to see what's going on in the field. On the other hand, it is also sobering when we realize those organizations who understand assets and workers at the foundational level must reassess their positions to truly leverage future innovation.



-----

Next post:  ruining your best field workers as salesman?

Listen/subscribe to last mile worker posts here:  http://lastmileworker.podomatic.com

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworker.com

-----


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed...