Skip to main content

Highest odds of closing


Is the art of "closing a deal" confined to just those with "sales" in their title? Who really are the salespeople in an organization?  Aren’t we all focused on providing value to our clients in the form of advising and executing solutions?  If that's the case then wouldn't everyone, including an innovator like myself, be considered a contributing member of sales?



Valuable and relevant perspectives are enhanced due to the amount of client data available and the ability to run this information through artificial intelligence.  If your sales folks have more than one opportunity they are chasing down, how are you facilitating their ability to prioritize activity focused on exceeding plan, understanding success patterns with clients, and correlating transactional and social dimensions which influence close probabilities?  It was no coincidence when Microsoft purchased LinkedIn just last year. The convergence of information around us, and our ability in 2017 to leverage this information, has never presented such an overwhelming opportunity to change the way we see sales.



A salesperson's ability to master the emotional quotient (EQ) remains to be paramount (including yet not limited to; trust, empathy, and persistence), be careful getting too comfortable as those which learn to balance the relationship and emerging technologies which provide digital insights, will rule the day.  Look at your existing tools, not as sales performance management but instead as intelligence based opportunity optimization.



-----

Next post:  people business, can I really get objective measurements?

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworker.com

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Who owns the data?

Finally the capital budget allows you to replace some very old equipment.    You can't open a trade magazine without seeing the latest news regarding the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).   Lucky for you the equipment manufacturers are offering an IIoT ready solution packaged with your equipment.   Suddenly your enthusiasm turns to confusion as you review the details of the quote.   What the hell is that subscription fee?   Isn't this equipment mine; lock, stock and barrel?   You mean to tell me that I need to pay the manufacturer, every month,   to give me the luxury of accessing data produced by the equipment I just purchased?   The only explanation has to be new math, at least as a child this is what my parents told me when I asked hard to answer questions. It's amazing how history repeats itself, we are starting to see manufacturer specific data languages appearing in their "smart" equipment.   Didn't we learn our lesson ...