Skip to main content

Hope wrapped in Futility


If you are in the service business, or any for that matter, I am sure that you are successful as a result of looking at your operation across different perspectives.  Certainly understanding your financials, customer needs, how your organization is learning and growing, and internal process are amongst the top areas of reflection.  It has perplexed me for years, with the aforementioned logic, that not everyone is flocking towards strategy maps and balanced scorecards.  I would have to say that businesses perceive this process as over-complicated and in many instances justifiably so; however, the juice is definitely worth the squeeze (my experience conducting these sessions for service organizations has produced an average of two four hour meetings with your companies leadership, and about four hours of non-meeting work).



What are you talking about?  Strategy mapping and balanced scorecards is a process developed years ago by Doctors' Kaplan and Norton at Harvard University.  The balanced scorecard (BSC) is a strategy performance management tool – a semi-standard structured visualization, supported by design methods and automation tools, that are used by managers to keep track of the execution of activities by staff within their control and to monitor consequences arising from these actions. Essentially a vehicle to put strategy into action. Some critical characteristics that define BSC are:

  • it's focus on the strategic agenda of the organization
  • the selection of a small number of data items to monitor
  • a mix of financial and nonfinancial perspectives



You can easily do this on your own as I have over the years. Two books that you might find interesting, both published by Harvard business school, are "the balanced scorecard" and "alignment" (in that order).  It is next to impossible to get where you're going without some form of map, all other attempts are simply hope wrapped in futility.



-----

Next post:  people business, can I really get objective measurements?

----- 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

suggesting is NOT selling

People and companies want to buy from people that they trust.   The individual which possesses the broadest set of knowledge will gain the most credibility and as a result yield high levels of trust.   When I was in the field I definitely had the ear of the customer and for the most part discussed areas that needed improvement or replacement. At no moment was I ever, at least in my mind, selling. Instead, as I think back on those days, I believe I was simply "suggesting". Take an immediate need, add in a trusted advisor and a credible suggestion, you will most likely get a sale. However, this is not selling. From my non-salesman perspective I would sum up the following related to the sales process; sales is not a single event but instead a sequence of connection points which create a positive experience that leads to a purchase . Over the years I've been fortunate to have known many different types of salespeople in different industries and I believe that they a...
Post a Comment
Read more

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...
Post a Comment
Read more

focus on your annuity base, come on man..

Stick with what you know and repeat often. When I think about maintenance, regardless of type of contract, I think about consistency, consistency, consistency. The motivation behind writing this post is to encourage you to either build or bolster your existing maintenance base, here are some things to consider: most maintenance contracts should yield between 5% and 7% additional revenue above and beyond the contract value.   Building trust between you and your clients organization will result in additional service activity. Full risk contracts, or those where you were charging one flat amount and taking all of the financial risk, can be profitable.   Watch out for the age of the equipment, service call track record, and customer disposition pull-through opportunities can be constrained with full risk contracts unless the scope of work is very specific. This can be a bit of a slippery slope. The perception of a...
Post a Comment
Read more