Skip to main content

Making any money on labor?


Nobody is going to be in business without making some level of margin; however, in the service business, margin on labor without anything else is not that great. Many service companies need to have parts, new equipment, or replacement equipment included in their work scope in order to see the type of margins we need to run our fairly inefficient businesses. It begs the question "why don't you just take longer"? Besides it being morally wrong, we still could not make enough margin, frankly if we took two hours and our competitors took one hour we would not be in business very long. So, what do you do, should you keep providing labor with shrinking margin expectations as competition enters the market? Or, do you think about how you apply labor differently.



For many organizations, they feel that they have a safe position by defaulting to a time and materials approach.  Hey, the risk is low for the service organization, if they take a little bit longer, nobody is the wiser and the customer generally pays.  I would say that recipe may have worked years ago, when information was not being collected and leveraged as it is today. If you believe that your company is productive and run efficiently, push more towards risk-based contracts. The customer gets a predictable cost and the more efficiently that you can operate within that scope the generally the higher the margin. Continuing down our current path is going to do nothing more than challenge us to figure out how we can survive on these dwindling margins. Instead we need to change the game, full risk contracting has been in place for many years, get your house in order and attack it with fervor.



You can change the story, and drive additional margin into your business.  Take the time to shore up your operations to ensure that when you enter the risky arena of full risk contracts you come out the other side making a profit. Good luck.



-----

Next post:  taking the time to build a balanced scorecard?

----- 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Digital distance

As influential Irene entered the dispatch department this hot July afternoon all that she heard was the tapping of keyboards.   The energy felt like a controlled, almost clinical environment.   It wasn't that many years ago when the sense of chaos, wrapped in genuine human concern for our clients, filled the room with a much different feeling.   Could it be that our ambitions to become more efficient, by leveraging technology has simply created a reason for us not to communicate verbally with one another?    Hasn't the idea all along been centered around our ability to spend more time with our customers? Making each and every one of them feel as if they are our most important client?   Certainly I'm not suggesting we go back to big chief tablets and number two pencils.   Yet, we need to reflect and strike a balance between digitization and delivery. By pure coincidence, avid Andy was composing a memo attempting to give his opinion, without tr...