Skip to main content

Making any money on labor?


Nobody is going to be in business without making some level of margin; however, in the service business, margin on labor without anything else is not that great. Many service companies need to have parts, new equipment, or replacement equipment included in their work scope in order to see the type of margins we need to run our fairly inefficient businesses. It begs the question "why don't you just take longer"? Besides it being morally wrong, we still could not make enough margin, frankly if we took two hours and our competitors took one hour we would not be in business very long. So, what do you do, should you keep providing labor with shrinking margin expectations as competition enters the market? Or, do you think about how you apply labor differently.



For many organizations, they feel that they have a safe position by defaulting to a time and materials approach.  Hey, the risk is low for the service organization, if they take a little bit longer, nobody is the wiser and the customer generally pays.  I would say that recipe may have worked years ago, when information was not being collected and leveraged as it is today. If you believe that your company is productive and run efficiently, push more towards risk-based contracts. The customer gets a predictable cost and the more efficiently that you can operate within that scope the generally the higher the margin. Continuing down our current path is going to do nothing more than challenge us to figure out how we can survive on these dwindling margins. Instead we need to change the game, full risk contracting has been in place for many years, get your house in order and attack it with fervor.



You can change the story, and drive additional margin into your business.  Take the time to shore up your operations to ensure that when you enter the risky arena of full risk contracts you come out the other side making a profit. Good luck.



-----

Next post:  taking the time to build a balanced scorecard?

----- 


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...
Post a Comment
Read more

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed...
Post a Comment
Read more