Skip to main content

Making any money on labor?


Nobody is going to be in business without making some level of margin; however, in the service business, margin on labor without anything else is not that great. Many service companies need to have parts, new equipment, or replacement equipment included in their work scope in order to see the type of margins we need to run our fairly inefficient businesses. It begs the question "why don't you just take longer"? Besides it being morally wrong, we still could not make enough margin, frankly if we took two hours and our competitors took one hour we would not be in business very long. So, what do you do, should you keep providing labor with shrinking margin expectations as competition enters the market? Or, do you think about how you apply labor differently.



For many organizations, they feel that they have a safe position by defaulting to a time and materials approach.  Hey, the risk is low for the service organization, if they take a little bit longer, nobody is the wiser and the customer generally pays.  I would say that recipe may have worked years ago, when information was not being collected and leveraged as it is today. If you believe that your company is productive and run efficiently, push more towards risk-based contracts. The customer gets a predictable cost and the more efficiently that you can operate within that scope the generally the higher the margin. Continuing down our current path is going to do nothing more than challenge us to figure out how we can survive on these dwindling margins. Instead we need to change the game, full risk contracting has been in place for many years, get your house in order and attack it with fervor.



You can change the story, and drive additional margin into your business.  Take the time to shore up your operations to ensure that when you enter the risky arena of full risk contracts you come out the other side making a profit. Good luck.



-----

Next post:  taking the time to build a balanced scorecard?

----- 


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...
Post a Comment
Read more

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Who owns the data?

Finally the capital budget allows you to replace some very old equipment.    You can't open a trade magazine without seeing the latest news regarding the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).   Lucky for you the equipment manufacturers are offering an IIoT ready solution packaged with your equipment.   Suddenly your enthusiasm turns to confusion as you review the details of the quote.   What the hell is that subscription fee?   Isn't this equipment mine; lock, stock and barrel?   You mean to tell me that I need to pay the manufacturer, every month,   to give me the luxury of accessing data produced by the equipment I just purchased?   The only explanation has to be new math, at least as a child this is what my parents told me when I asked hard to answer questions. It's amazing how history repeats itself, we are starting to see manufacturer specific data languages appearing in their "smart" equipment.   Didn't we learn our lesson ...
Post a Comment
Read more