Skip to main content

Much more then sensors


Everyone knows that the wise man starts any innovative designs with the business objective(s) in mind. Tremendous clarity occurs when we can identify with the business requirements and then work backwards to translate these needs into toolsets. It gets a bit tricky when the change seems so logical, like connected systems, yet the business model is screaming for a new paradigm. 



Think about the paradox, as a service industry we bring in lots of sensors and indicators to help us formulate our decisions to send a person to a site based off of field / asset conditions . That seems all well enough for those businesses which aren't making money from a truck roll.  Even if the type of dispatch is related to maintenance in many cases this maintenance is simply negotiated labor and materials markup, we are still making money when we roll a truck. Service organizations which have embraced the "full responsibility" type of contracts are in a much better position to leverage emerging tools and their direct impact on the bottom line.



So it's settled then, if you are going to deploy IOT and/or connected systems, convert your business to full risk contracts. Sound okay to you? While this approach is certainly logical I'm not sure that it is the best way to approach this because it leaves quite a bit of opportunity on the table. If you believe for a moment that the customers interests are to preserve the life of their assets, by the way individual and holistically, then possibly this narrow approach on just mechanical equipment may not be the right way to move forward. Take for instance an unsophisticated building, for conversation let's say under 50,000 ft.², properly deployed innovation stands to help that client reduce their utility and operating costs. If that is the case, then wouldn't a plausible solution be some mixture of the components of full responsibility, those elements of shared utility savings, and even elements from performance contracting (too far?). When all these are mixed up in the same stew could that provide a new business model?



Simple fact is if you are thinking about connected systems and innovation within your business I strongly encourage you to consider first what your ultimate objective is, second how your business will make money, and third how you will differentiate yourself in the market.



Comments encouraged



-----

Next post:  in the "people" business can you really measure performance?

Questions?  feel free to leave replies or direct message me

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworker.com

-----
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...
Post a Comment
Read more

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...
Post a Comment
Read more

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed...
Post a Comment
Read more