Skip to main content

Ruining your best field workers


It used to just chap my ass when I was in the field as a technician and somebody would call me a salesperson. Hey, I was there to ride in on the white horse and save the day from call to call, the reason many service technicians get out of bed in the morning. The reference to being a salesperson was difficult as many times the salesperson would offer X and we had to deliver Y. However, when the dust settles whether you are in sales or operations, the field or the office, we should all be focused on one common thing and that is providing solutions to our clients.



In many industries, a key component of sales is trust and relationships. Most service technicians, at least those that have been to a site more than once, have those qualities in spades. So, it stands to reason that if a field service person is trusted that the natural place for them to land would be in sales. As a matter of fact, they would probably outsell any sales person because of their knowledge of the operating system. Well, not so true. Sure, there are those times that field people transition from a technical role to a pure sales role, and those that make the transition are very successful. The skill sets and the emotional quotient of these two roles are vastly different. If a technician is successful selling as a technician it is likely to do with their knowledge and credibility; however, they are essentially order takers. If a salesperson is successful it likely has to do with the deliberate effort they have exerted to build trust with the client.



The best transitions for workers to sales positions are those which have allowed the transition to occur over a period of time. Add a quota to the service person and allow them to experience proactive sales as opposed to reactive order taking.  Proceed with caution, when it comes to people things are rarely logical.



-----

Next post:  vetting sub-contractors

Listen/subscribe to last mile worker posts here:  http://lastmileworker.podomatic.com

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworker.com

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Who owns the data?

Finally the capital budget allows you to replace some very old equipment.    You can't open a trade magazine without seeing the latest news regarding the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).   Lucky for you the equipment manufacturers are offering an IIoT ready solution packaged with your equipment.   Suddenly your enthusiasm turns to confusion as you review the details of the quote.   What the hell is that subscription fee?   Isn't this equipment mine; lock, stock and barrel?   You mean to tell me that I need to pay the manufacturer, every month,   to give me the luxury of accessing data produced by the equipment I just purchased?   The only explanation has to be new math, at least as a child this is what my parents told me when I asked hard to answer questions. It's amazing how history repeats itself, we are starting to see manufacturer specific data languages appearing in their "smart" equipment.   Didn't we learn our lesson ...