Skip to main content

who owns the client?


The look on Oscar's face was as priceless as a kitten looking into a fishbowl.  Those jubilant feelings were evaporating quickly as overwhelmed Oscar began to consider his response to the customer simple statement of "you mean you are not always going to send Johnny to my site anymore?". Today, in many cases, the fact that a worker actually "owns" a customer is one of the primary reasons Oscar ended up with his nickname of overwhelmed. It is next to impossible to drive superior service performance to our client while balancing the customers favorite worker. We have known all along that this delicate balance of a preferred worker per jobsite is important to attract new workers and maintain long fruitful relationships.

Why? No doubt a relationship with the customer is very important. Can you honestly say if you had the information; where the equipment was located, site nuances, access codes and ladder positions, would you continue this same ridiculous practice? Is it in the company's best interest that a single worker owns the company's clients? Should we reinforce this behavior by hiring workers not only on their skill level but also on the number of contracts and customers they can bring with them? When will the madness stop!  As our workforces continue to dwindle, it will become increasingly important that we get the right person with the right skills on the right work activity. Our clients may love us and like Johnny and his personality; however, if we don't maintain that equipment, keep it running trouble-free and energy efficient, we are out of a job. God bless our customers as they should throw each and every one of us to the curb if our number one priority is not asset optimization.

So what's the sense of urgency? We are exploring connected systems and artificial intelligence daily, the effort is significant and worthwhile. Our challenges in evolving the industry, while technology may take center stage now, will really boil down to our ability to change our business and our culture. We must start breaking the dependencies and democratize the way that we objectively distribute and manage our clients and work activities.

----- 
Next post:  who's data is it?
-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed...