Skip to main content

"Why" now?


Everyone knows that if you are sincerely interested in making change stick you must address the question of "why". Amazingly so many focus a disproportionate amount of energy on the "what" and "how" instead of first trying to wrap our heads around why we need change in the first place. 



LOSERS:  Leading with "what" and "how", honorable mention to "why"

It wasn't long after the turn-of-the-century (boy if that doesn't make you feel old) in 2001 when I took my first job as a chief information officer (CIO). The world was different; we were enabling folks with digital technology that they could not find anywhere else. Rolling the clock forward to 2017, many enterprises are woefully behind what can be found in consumer grade tools.  Our timelines, between upgrades or introductions of innovation, were measured in multiple months and even years. Our efforts in explaining "what" and "how", combined with business process reengineering, left us in a pretty good spot with regards to influencing change.



WINNERS:  Leading with "why" and bringing in "what" as a second fiddle, barely concerned with "how"

Certainly, a lot has changed since the turn-of-the-century. In context with this post some of the most significant components are; prolific use of the Internet, powerful mobile devices, and citizen developers of applications.  Now it is more important than ever to clearly understand "why" you are implementing change. A stream of products over the years has changed from a trickle to a life-threatening wild river. All we have is the ability to clearly articulate "why", when successfully executed the "how" will become almost insignificant.



We must exert more effort than ever before in clearly understanding our customers’ objectives and wrangle this rapid pace of innovative change to exceed their expectations.  Hold on, we have only just begun!



-----

Next post:  leveraging building intelligence

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworker.com

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...

expert at everything...not a problem

Well... I would say sometimes there certainly is a perceived notion that one person is an expert at everything. For the worker "everything" may be defined as the specific area in which you were hired or are constantly scheduled. Our opinions are frequently influenced off of past experience, or information we've received from their coworkers. Unfortunately this only gives us partial insight to that workers expertise and often is limited to their most recent history. Narrowly focused accounting is made of the skills that this individual possess. Come on, can't we figure out a way to leverage all of the skills of a particular worker? One of the challenges has always been that relationship between the activities which need to be accomplished and the myriad skills of individuals within your workforce. In addition, even if you could inventory and get a pretty good handle on the skill sets, they are constantly changing (with any luck) and thus the ineffective process of ...

Who owns the data?

Finally the capital budget allows you to replace some very old equipment.    You can't open a trade magazine without seeing the latest news regarding the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT).   Lucky for you the equipment manufacturers are offering an IIoT ready solution packaged with your equipment.   Suddenly your enthusiasm turns to confusion as you review the details of the quote.   What the hell is that subscription fee?   Isn't this equipment mine; lock, stock and barrel?   You mean to tell me that I need to pay the manufacturer, every month,   to give me the luxury of accessing data produced by the equipment I just purchased?   The only explanation has to be new math, at least as a child this is what my parents told me when I asked hard to answer questions. It's amazing how history repeats itself, we are starting to see manufacturer specific data languages appearing in their "smart" equipment.   Didn't we learn our lesson ...