Skip to main content

"Why" now?


Everyone knows that if you are sincerely interested in making change stick you must address the question of "why". Amazingly so many focus a disproportionate amount of energy on the "what" and "how" instead of first trying to wrap our heads around why we need change in the first place. 



LOSERS:  Leading with "what" and "how", honorable mention to "why"

It wasn't long after the turn-of-the-century (boy if that doesn't make you feel old) in 2001 when I took my first job as a chief information officer (CIO). The world was different; we were enabling folks with digital technology that they could not find anywhere else. Rolling the clock forward to 2017, many enterprises are woefully behind what can be found in consumer grade tools.  Our timelines, between upgrades or introductions of innovation, were measured in multiple months and even years. Our efforts in explaining "what" and "how", combined with business process reengineering, left us in a pretty good spot with regards to influencing change.



WINNERS:  Leading with "why" and bringing in "what" as a second fiddle, barely concerned with "how"

Certainly, a lot has changed since the turn-of-the-century. In context with this post some of the most significant components are; prolific use of the Internet, powerful mobile devices, and citizen developers of applications.  Now it is more important than ever to clearly understand "why" you are implementing change. A stream of products over the years has changed from a trickle to a life-threatening wild river. All we have is the ability to clearly articulate "why", when successfully executed the "how" will become almost insignificant.



We must exert more effort than ever before in clearly understanding our customers’ objectives and wrangle this rapid pace of innovative change to exceed their expectations.  Hold on, we have only just begun!



-----

Next post:  leveraging building intelligence

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworker.com

-----
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

suggesting is NOT selling

People and companies want to buy from people that they trust.   The individual which possesses the broadest set of knowledge will gain the most credibility and as a result yield high levels of trust.   When I was in the field I definitely had the ear of the customer and for the most part discussed areas that needed improvement or replacement. At no moment was I ever, at least in my mind, selling. Instead, as I think back on those days, I believe I was simply "suggesting". Take an immediate need, add in a trusted advisor and a credible suggestion, you will most likely get a sale. However, this is not selling. From my non-salesman perspective I would sum up the following related to the sales process; sales is not a single event but instead a sequence of connection points which create a positive experience that leads to a purchase . Over the years I've been fortunate to have known many different types of salespeople in different industries and I believe that they a...
Post a Comment
Read more

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...
Post a Comment
Read more

focus on your annuity base, come on man..

Stick with what you know and repeat often. When I think about maintenance, regardless of type of contract, I think about consistency, consistency, consistency. The motivation behind writing this post is to encourage you to either build or bolster your existing maintenance base, here are some things to consider: most maintenance contracts should yield between 5% and 7% additional revenue above and beyond the contract value.   Building trust between you and your clients organization will result in additional service activity. Full risk contracts, or those where you were charging one flat amount and taking all of the financial risk, can be profitable.   Watch out for the age of the equipment, service call track record, and customer disposition pull-through opportunities can be constrained with full risk contracts unless the scope of work is very specific. This can be a bit of a slippery slope. The perception of a...
Post a Comment
Read more