Skip to main content

justify PM; into the bathtub...


While not often discussed, Avid Andy has been known to have some serious flashbacks.  Hallucinogenic drugs from parties long ago or dropped one time too many times as a child, your guess is as good as mine.  Andy recalled the time, years ago when we just stopped performing maintenance on exhaust fans under "x" CFM.  Sure, reliability advances in the product, declining costs, were all contributors to us changing our maintenance routines.  Could it be time to once again re-assess our approaches, this time on unitary systems under "x" tonnage?  Do we have any idea how to even approach such a decision?  Certainly IIoT promises to give us more information in the future, once we have the data to model; however, might we reflect back on fundamental logic around MTFB (mean time between faults) and EOL (end of life) calculations.  My favorite visual is sketched as the image above, some liberties to the traditional "bath tub" theory were taken. 



Shown are three main columns, decreasing, constant, and increasing failure rates.  As you might imagine, everything runs great to start, and most of you reading this believe that when proper maintenance is performed we can minimize the issues during the "constant" failure rate time period.  To illustrate this point you can see the contrast of the green line (when proper PM is performed) and the red line (when little to no PM is performed).  The purple line represents failures seen at start-up or shortly thereafter, also known as infant mortality (don't shoot the messenger, this is really the term).   This chart, and the aforementioned explanation, is probably making all of the service companies happy, patting their backs saying "yep, I told you so".



Down deep inside, after nearly four decades in the service business, I really want to believe.  Unfortunately the missing point of data is cost or financial impact.  This post leaves me with more questions than answers; how long do I really want a unitary system to run, heck after 10 years the efficiency and control gains have been significant.  If I saved my money by performing minimalistic PM at the beginning, put that money in a contingency fund and paid for increased equipment failures, would I be money ahead?  Has the cost and reliability of say, a 5 ton package unit come down to the point where we should only be changing filters (isn't this what 90% of home owners are doing already?)?



These questions / reflections are healthy, you should be challenging yourselves on making sure that we are all focused squarely on maximizing customer value.  Always in business, and especially in these rapidly changing times, you must be excellent at pivoting.



-----

Next post:  from the field to the office

Thoughts?  feel free to leave replies or direct message

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworkersolutions.com

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is custom software in 2019 spelled EGO?

I still struggle , as do many, with the rationalization between building software and buying software. Microsoft Excel , likely one of the most widely recognized packaged software applications, was released over 30 years ago . My guess is not many people would consider building a custom piece of software which performs math and other worksheet related tasks. While this is an obvious example, it highlights an important factor for many in deciding between custom and configurable software solutions . Fact is, everybody understands how Microsoft Excel works. Let's mix it up a bit and add the opinions that you have regarding what makes your approach to business so special.   The things that you do, in an industry, which are totally unique to your competitors.   This is where it gets a bit murky, we must tease out the transactional components from the value add aspects of software.   For instance, you use a staffing system to help find, manage, and retain internal and external

no one told you when to run

From the clients perspective, what is the perfect service call? "To interpret my field conditions and apply a solution which resolves the issue immediately and ensures trouble-free long-term operation. Delivered by a professional, courteous, empathetic, appropriately skilled, years of experience, materials required for repair, a good listener, and one that treats me as if I am their only customer; amen"! As you might expect the perfect service call is really a blend of attitudes, attributes, and capabilities. The trick is, while we all may agree that these aspects make the perfect service call, endeavoring to achieve these results is becoming increasingly more difficult. Our customers, with their visibility and awareness of our activities, raise the bar regarding the level of service that we need to provide. Let's unpack a few of these elements: Appropriately skilled :   haven't we all had this discussion in the past?   My workers are all

Modern tech moving us forward?

Think about some of the most recent technologies;   Solar fields, I doubt the designers considered the impact on the bird population; Facebook , do you believe that they thought about the long-term ramifications regarding how false news might be proliferated through this platform; Twitter , could anyone imagine it would be such a haven for bullies; and what about TOR, the US government "internet" built for military families use in foreign countries which has turned into the " dark web " were all sorts of things are bought and sold? I would like to believe that all of these started with the best intentions in mind. Unfortunately it is not enough to dissuade those with impure and nefarious intentions.   I continue to get excited about the future with items such as IOT and cognitive computing machines, assisting us in making better and more deliberate decisions, the other part of me gets nervous that we will inadvertently create a world of "black boxes&