Skip to main content

justify PM; into the bathtub...


While not often discussed, Avid Andy has been known to have some serious flashbacks.  Hallucinogenic drugs from parties long ago or dropped one time too many times as a child, your guess is as good as mine.  Andy recalled the time, years ago when we just stopped performing maintenance on exhaust fans under "x" CFM.  Sure, reliability advances in the product, declining costs, were all contributors to us changing our maintenance routines.  Could it be time to once again re-assess our approaches, this time on unitary systems under "x" tonnage?  Do we have any idea how to even approach such a decision?  Certainly IIoT promises to give us more information in the future, once we have the data to model; however, might we reflect back on fundamental logic around MTFB (mean time between faults) and EOL (end of life) calculations.  My favorite visual is sketched as the image above, some liberties to the traditional "bath tub" theory were taken. 



Shown are three main columns, decreasing, constant, and increasing failure rates.  As you might imagine, everything runs great to start, and most of you reading this believe that when proper maintenance is performed we can minimize the issues during the "constant" failure rate time period.  To illustrate this point you can see the contrast of the green line (when proper PM is performed) and the red line (when little to no PM is performed).  The purple line represents failures seen at start-up or shortly thereafter, also known as infant mortality (don't shoot the messenger, this is really the term).   This chart, and the aforementioned explanation, is probably making all of the service companies happy, patting their backs saying "yep, I told you so".



Down deep inside, after nearly four decades in the service business, I really want to believe.  Unfortunately the missing point of data is cost or financial impact.  This post leaves me with more questions than answers; how long do I really want a unitary system to run, heck after 10 years the efficiency and control gains have been significant.  If I saved my money by performing minimalistic PM at the beginning, put that money in a contingency fund and paid for increased equipment failures, would I be money ahead?  Has the cost and reliability of say, a 5 ton package unit come down to the point where we should only be changing filters (isn't this what 90% of home owners are doing already?)?



These questions / reflections are healthy, you should be challenging yourselves on making sure that we are all focused squarely on maximizing customer value.  Always in business, and especially in these rapidly changing times, you must be excellent at pivoting.



-----

Next post:  from the field to the office

Thoughts?  feel free to leave replies or direct message

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworkersolutions.com

-----

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

resilience, do you believe?

Seeking out the closest spot to the door of the office was not a common practice; however, at 07:00 on August 24th, 2022 the temperature was already 96' and 98% humidity.   The building would have a hell of a time keeping up today, rolling black-outs and brown-outs would be inevitable.   It likely won't be an outright equipment shut-down, instead we will have to endure the impending "brown-out" conditions, a slow, low voltage and high amperage stressing of our electrical infrastructure and connected systems. Our deliberate and continuous leverage of Industrial IoT (IIoT) technology and the companion AI prescriptive models have positioned us well. It had to be around the year 2018 when we invested in IIoT.   Heck, most were comparing our endeavors to the "Nest" thermostat, a pioneer (yet very fundamental) entrée into home-based IoT.   Naysayers were laughing that we would never see the benefits; however, our fragile National infrastructure and Mothe...
Post a Comment
Read more

is your "score", you?

Avid Andy begins to wonder if he may be schizophrenic.   Or could it be a sign of true genius when he can see a problem from all sides? Andy was reflecting on a service meeting that happened last week.   Conversation was around our ability to objectively measure things and make better decisions. At the center of almost any measurement environment are the fundamentals of math. To determine priority or influence, it seems logical when dealing with inanimate objects like sensors, assets, and sites in a portfolio to move towards "point-based systems". The real dilemma for Andy seemed to comes when we begin scoring humans and letting pre-determined algorithms establish an individuals path. Our service meeting quickly changed from tactical to philosophical discussions and one of the technicians, Pragmatic Paul, made mention of a black mirror program (Netflix) named "Nosedive".    In this futuristic episode, an individuals score dictates their behavior and those ...
Post a Comment
Read more

In$pired

As the steam from Avid Andy's coffee fogged his glasses on this crisp January morning, he reflected on last year and thought enthusiastically about the year ahead.   Sometimes the noise of business is deafening, we rarely take the time to contemplate our moves, instead are often thrown one direction or another.   Hey, face it, if you are reading posts to gain perspective you fall in the group of folks who pride themselves as obsequious hoop-jumpers.   We live to help others and expect that all of those around us feel the same way.   I just love Influential Irene.   Okay, it is out in the open, she is an inspiration for me and so many others.   Irene reminds folks every year, without fail, these three statements which she fondly refers to as "the punchline" (although this is no joke).   Businesses, of any size, will be successful if they remember that it is people that make a company.   Put this advice into practice, today: Sincerity |...
Post a Comment
Read more