Skip to main content

Magnificent Models | what are you predicting?


The next agenda topic in our executive meeting was IIoT and predictive service. Avid Andy had a feeling that this was going to be a controversial   topic as there was a lot of ambiguity surrounding the definition of data science-based modeling.  This was an opportunity to jump right in and start a brief discussion on the meaning and impact that data science-based learning models could have on the organization.  He began by defining a couple distinct types of models:



  1. The market today is filled with lots of misleading information, our competitors all say they can predict, we ourselves have manufacturers stating that they can also predict, and our customers have an expectation that we are predicting. My question is, predicting what? Aligned to which customer outcome? If we do not have a clear picture of all the elements combined with the customer outcome all we will get are unintelligent responses such as your automobiles "check engine soon" light.
  2. What level of confidence will you need from the predictive model? For instance, let's say that you were trying to predict when the air filters at any given jobsite are going to need to be replaced. Sounds relatively straightforward and the worst thing that would happen is that you may send somebody a bit too early or a bit too late. Another scenario might be when the battery needs to be changed in a pacemaker. The predictive algorithms and the confidence level that you are going to need to have in your outputs will need to be much higher on the replacement of the pacemaker battery.  This all boils down to the level of investment on what your sensing and how you're expected outcome when leveraging that data.



Once you understand the customer's objective (s) you need to combine that with your own business objectives. Is the reason that you are using predictive modeling is to give you an edge in the market? If that is the case than the models that you choose should be single models, possibly only looking at one element and having the right to claim, rightly so, that you are predicting an outcome. However, if you are trying to turn around or mitigate risk within your organization, you may need to look at multiple pieces of equipment and their predictive models to see how, when combined with one another, create different perspectives which may alter your course of business. These are very different approaches, they all need predictive models and data, certainly investment, but their level of sophistication is vastly different. Both are valuable, the bottom line will be how well aligned the model is to your business conditions and environment.



The final thing to remember, don't shy away from collecting data, even the data which you may not see a direct use for today. This data is commonly stored in an inexpensive format often referred to as a data lake. If your ambitions are to mature your predictive models and evolve them eventually into prescriptive models, you will need all the data you can get your hands on.  Andy was beginning to lose his team members in the executive meeting and decided to summarize using a few bullet points;

  • grab as much data as you possibly can
  • leverage other people's models to create a holistic model of your own which can align to customer outcomes
  • start small with laser focus and understand your market and the models value



Learning models, and the algorithms contained within, can drive incredible value to your business. It is key that you understand how the outputs of these data science-based objects influence action with in your current operating environments. Keep in mind that IIoT, data sciences, and even workforce sciences, are as much about the tools as they are about the cultural and market-based changes required to truly evolve your operation.



-----

Next post:  your face is our face

Thoughts?  feel free to leave replies or direct message

See all "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworkersolutions.com

-----
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking AI (artifical intelligence)

You're talking but I can't hear you.   Everyone can certainly understand this condition; the "Peanuts" parents who sounded exactly like your own, your significant other while you watch your favorite game on TV, or most importantly a work colleague or partner which you are attempting to communicate a thought or vision.   All of these, and many other examples, have plagued our organizations long past the childhood game of telephone (passing your words to another, and on to another, etc.).   So what?   What has changed?   Besides the velocity of products hitting the market, the requirements that we have for our business now needs to be interpreted by data scientists, yet another abstraction layer from the field conditions.   Think about this example; TODAY :   we often think in binary terms, if "x" happens do "y" …   take a sales person seeking potential leads by searching a system for the last time we made contact TOMMOR...
Post a Comment
Read more

Are "mistakes" good or bad?

One of the attributes that make a great technician is the fact that they have made a lot of mistakes. Our biggest challenge is recalling those mistakes ourselves and as importantly sharing them with others on our team. Every single day we go out and fix things, many of them are routine and may not require any form of documentation or sharing; however, there are those instances where we have discovered gold. The trick is to make sure that we can learn from our mistakes in a systematic manner and have the ability to spread the information throughout our organization in a useful and relevant way. Corrective action, an integral part of a quality system, is the absolute best vehicle to put in place for your organization. Some of you may have been turned off by the words "quality system", don't worry you can still deploy a corrective culture without having to understand completely how corrective action and quality management systems work. The process is very straightf...
Post a Comment
Read more

months to aquire, moments to lose

It is just hard to imagine that one of the most common reasons maintenance contracts are lost is because people don't show up and don't pay attention to the details.   In many cases maintenance is an investment to keep the life of your asset running for a protracted period of time. However the length on many maintenance contracts is not even close to the life expectancy of that equipment, so if you don't really have any idea what maintenance is being performed then how do you really know if it's being done to your specification? Thus, it really boils down to business elements, assuming that you are actually performing the work, our focus needs to be on how you are differentiated. Let's take a look at a couple of the most common business-related reasons why people lose maintenance contracts. Not showing up ; managing contracts can be complicated between the sites, number of assets, and the frequencies at which items need to be maintained, can a...
Post a Comment
Read more