Skip to main content

Crisis does not have to be Chaotic


Sure, we get it, resilience is the new "buzz word", all of us must have the ability "to bounce back" when faced with a crisis.  You could see the eyes start to roll back in Frazzled Franks head, who always had a negative opinion.  Heck, come to think of it, Frank gives Natalie Naysayer a run for her money.  Frank, started Old Ollie, resilience is not that black and white.  Ollie, taking off his ballcap and resting his chin in the butt of his hand, started to reminisce about his days working at the refinery.  Back then, we had a process known as reliability centered maintenance.  It was pretty straightforward, take a look at the approach, rationalize what is the most important, and support your hypothesis with data.



Ollie, you are talking about maintenance and we are trying to make sure that our building is resilient; blurted Frank.  Ollie continued; the trick is the balance between what areas will have the greatest impact on your customers (revenue) and those items which you can change (span of control).  For instance, let's say your building is five stories and the elevator lands on your customer impact list.  Upon further assessment you determine that the juice may not be worth the squeeze as occupants could take the stairs.  However, when you float this idea with your tenants you discover that they hate the dimly lit stairwells, certainly an easy problem to solve.  Without significant investment this operation has become more resilient.  Thanks Ollie, that was a simple example said Frank in a sarcastic voice.  Let's talk about those items out of our control such as loss of power or water.



Frank, here are some considerations to get you started in identifying potential crisis points within your operation:

  1. Starting with the consumer or employees input, ask them; from your perspective, what is the one thing that could turn your day upside down?
  2. Organize the feedback into broad categories, whatever fits your business
  3. Once in categories, blend the feedback into themes or focus areas and score them based on impact to the customer experience (which will translate to revenue)
  4. Now, shift your way to think about the themes and go back through the categories and themes now scoring them based on your collective opinion on how much ability you have to control the crisis event 
  5. Finally, taking the scores, reorganize and start getting creative with solutions for the top three ONLY
    1. Once the top three are completed, start over again from the top



Fantastic Ollie, thank you for the logical plan.  Frank, getting outsiders involved in contemplating solutions can be a real eye-opener, often we are too close and cant see the forest for the trees.



-----

Next post:  from the field to the office

Thoughts?  feel free to leave replies or direct message

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworkersolutions.com

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is custom software in 2019 spelled EGO?

I still struggle , as do many, with the rationalization between building software and buying software. Microsoft Excel , likely one of the most widely recognized packaged software applications, was released over 30 years ago . My guess is not many people would consider building a custom piece of software which performs math and other worksheet related tasks. While this is an obvious example, it highlights an important factor for many in deciding between custom and configurable software solutions . Fact is, everybody understands how Microsoft Excel works. Let's mix it up a bit and add the opinions that you have regarding what makes your approach to business so special.   The things that you do, in an industry, which are totally unique to your competitors.   This is where it gets a bit murky, we must tease out the transactional components from the value add aspects of software.   For instance, you use a staffing system to help find, manage, and retain internal and external

no one told you when to run

From the clients perspective, what is the perfect service call? "To interpret my field conditions and apply a solution which resolves the issue immediately and ensures trouble-free long-term operation. Delivered by a professional, courteous, empathetic, appropriately skilled, years of experience, materials required for repair, a good listener, and one that treats me as if I am their only customer; amen"! As you might expect the perfect service call is really a blend of attitudes, attributes, and capabilities. The trick is, while we all may agree that these aspects make the perfect service call, endeavoring to achieve these results is becoming increasingly more difficult. Our customers, with their visibility and awareness of our activities, raise the bar regarding the level of service that we need to provide. Let's unpack a few of these elements: Appropriately skilled :   haven't we all had this discussion in the past?   My workers are all

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed prope