Skip to main content

Crisis does not have to be Chaotic


Sure, we get it, resilience is the new "buzz word", all of us must have the ability "to bounce back" when faced with a crisis.  You could see the eyes start to roll back in Frazzled Franks head, who always had a negative opinion.  Heck, come to think of it, Frank gives Natalie Naysayer a run for her money.  Frank, started Old Ollie, resilience is not that black and white.  Ollie, taking off his ballcap and resting his chin in the butt of his hand, started to reminisce about his days working at the refinery.  Back then, we had a process known as reliability centered maintenance.  It was pretty straightforward, take a look at the approach, rationalize what is the most important, and support your hypothesis with data.



Ollie, you are talking about maintenance and we are trying to make sure that our building is resilient; blurted Frank.  Ollie continued; the trick is the balance between what areas will have the greatest impact on your customers (revenue) and those items which you can change (span of control).  For instance, let's say your building is five stories and the elevator lands on your customer impact list.  Upon further assessment you determine that the juice may not be worth the squeeze as occupants could take the stairs.  However, when you float this idea with your tenants you discover that they hate the dimly lit stairwells, certainly an easy problem to solve.  Without significant investment this operation has become more resilient.  Thanks Ollie, that was a simple example said Frank in a sarcastic voice.  Let's talk about those items out of our control such as loss of power or water.



Frank, here are some considerations to get you started in identifying potential crisis points within your operation:

  1. Starting with the consumer or employees input, ask them; from your perspective, what is the one thing that could turn your day upside down?
  2. Organize the feedback into broad categories, whatever fits your business
  3. Once in categories, blend the feedback into themes or focus areas and score them based on impact to the customer experience (which will translate to revenue)
  4. Now, shift your way to think about the themes and go back through the categories and themes now scoring them based on your collective opinion on how much ability you have to control the crisis event 
  5. Finally, taking the scores, reorganize and start getting creative with solutions for the top three ONLY
    1. Once the top three are completed, start over again from the top



Fantastic Ollie, thank you for the logical plan.  Frank, getting outsiders involved in contemplating solutions can be a real eye-opener, often we are too close and cant see the forest for the trees.



-----

Next post:  from the field to the office

Thoughts?  feel free to leave replies or direct message

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworkersolutions.com

-----

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

why transform?

Why do I want to change, who said anything was wrong with my stack of papers and sea of Excel files?   We solve problems, that is a key characteristic of any successful service organization, if it isn't broke why fix it?   Often, when discussing a transformation from paper or cobbled together systems to a cohesive digital approach, folks struggle with the gap between what they currently do and how digital tools can help.   You really need to look at where the pain points are in your organization and how these compare to your business objectives.   Consider writing down these points on the whiteboard in no particular order, spend a few days shuffling and consolidating into a prioritized list.   Once you have the "why" and the "what" identified, the old remaining step is "how".   Some of the most popular observations over the years have been; Slipping through the cracks :   you know, not the major muscle movements, instead those little i...

entusiastic about preventative maintenance

Why do I really care if my field technicians are enthusiastic or not? When you look at a person's work output, as directly related to workforce sciences, you come up with three primary ingredients required to achieve your desired results.   These ingredients are; attitudes, attributes, and capabilities and when mixed properly with enabling tools can yield unbelievable outputs. So what does any of this have to do with routine maintenance? If your maintenance routines actually become way too routine then pretty soon performance will be replaced with complacency. In order to keep any piece of equipment running as trouble-free as possible the maintenance performed, and the thoroughness of the inspection and tasks at hand, have a direct impact on the asset's life expectancy.   There are some strategies that help service organizations keep the enthusiasm at all-time highs. Switch techs from time to time :   One of the best ways to ensure maintenance is being performed...

show me the money

This could definitely be one of those topics where you may be hearing voices. One voice, used when speaking with others, is telling folks that your career and the ability to make a difference is much more important than what you are being paid. While on the other hand your other voice, and I have noticed this voice gets louder and softer depending upon your age and circumstances, may be screaming get as much as you can for the work you're currently performing.   Isn't it really all about purpose?   How else can you explain schoolteachers, police and firemen, and the United States Military; all driven by the visceral desire to help and change people's lives. We certainly know, with the exception of a few in the aforementioned careers, they are not in it for the money (indeed, something seems very backwards here).   Evidence exists (@mercer) that shows if you are paying a worker within the normal range of income for their position then it is likely that being motivated ...