Skip to main content

Crisis does not have to be Chaotic


Sure, we get it, resilience is the new "buzz word", all of us must have the ability "to bounce back" when faced with a crisis.  You could see the eyes start to roll back in Frazzled Franks head, who always had a negative opinion.  Heck, come to think of it, Frank gives Natalie Naysayer a run for her money.  Frank, started Old Ollie, resilience is not that black and white.  Ollie, taking off his ballcap and resting his chin in the butt of his hand, started to reminisce about his days working at the refinery.  Back then, we had a process known as reliability centered maintenance.  It was pretty straightforward, take a look at the approach, rationalize what is the most important, and support your hypothesis with data.



Ollie, you are talking about maintenance and we are trying to make sure that our building is resilient; blurted Frank.  Ollie continued; the trick is the balance between what areas will have the greatest impact on your customers (revenue) and those items which you can change (span of control).  For instance, let's say your building is five stories and the elevator lands on your customer impact list.  Upon further assessment you determine that the juice may not be worth the squeeze as occupants could take the stairs.  However, when you float this idea with your tenants you discover that they hate the dimly lit stairwells, certainly an easy problem to solve.  Without significant investment this operation has become more resilient.  Thanks Ollie, that was a simple example said Frank in a sarcastic voice.  Let's talk about those items out of our control such as loss of power or water.



Frank, here are some considerations to get you started in identifying potential crisis points within your operation:

  1. Starting with the consumer or employees input, ask them; from your perspective, what is the one thing that could turn your day upside down?
  2. Organize the feedback into broad categories, whatever fits your business
  3. Once in categories, blend the feedback into themes or focus areas and score them based on impact to the customer experience (which will translate to revenue)
  4. Now, shift your way to think about the themes and go back through the categories and themes now scoring them based on your collective opinion on how much ability you have to control the crisis event 
  5. Finally, taking the scores, reorganize and start getting creative with solutions for the top three ONLY
    1. Once the top three are completed, start over again from the top



Fantastic Ollie, thank you for the logical plan.  Frank, getting outsiders involved in contemplating solutions can be a real eye-opener, often we are too close and cant see the forest for the trees.



-----

Next post:  from the field to the office

Thoughts?  feel free to leave replies or direct message

See all of the "last mile worker" posts here:  http://lastmileworkersolutions.com

-----
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Speaking AI (artifical intelligence)

You're talking but I can't hear you.   Everyone can certainly understand this condition; the "Peanuts" parents who sounded exactly like your own, your significant other while you watch your favorite game on TV, or most importantly a work colleague or partner which you are attempting to communicate a thought or vision.   All of these, and many other examples, have plagued our organizations long past the childhood game of telephone (passing your words to another, and on to another, etc.).   So what?   What has changed?   Besides the velocity of products hitting the market, the requirements that we have for our business now needs to be interpreted by data scientists, yet another abstraction layer from the field conditions.   Think about this example; TODAY :   we often think in binary terms, if "x" happens do "y" …   take a sales person seeking potential leads by searching a system for the last time we made contact TOMMOR...
Post a Comment
Read more

months to aquire, moments to lose

It is just hard to imagine that one of the most common reasons maintenance contracts are lost is because people don't show up and don't pay attention to the details.   In many cases maintenance is an investment to keep the life of your asset running for a protracted period of time. However the length on many maintenance contracts is not even close to the life expectancy of that equipment, so if you don't really have any idea what maintenance is being performed then how do you really know if it's being done to your specification? Thus, it really boils down to business elements, assuming that you are actually performing the work, our focus needs to be on how you are differentiated. Let's take a look at a couple of the most common business-related reasons why people lose maintenance contracts. Not showing up ; managing contracts can be complicated between the sites, number of assets, and the frequencies at which items need to be maintained, can a...
Post a Comment
Read more

is seeing comprehending?

Oh yeah, visual inspections are why God gave us eyes.   There is not a single machine learning, IoT, computerized environment that can match the skills a human's brain can assess and deliver based on visual feedback. The trick is making sure that the person connected to those eyeballs actually knows what they are looking for!   Face it, aren't the best workers those that can recognize an issue long before it becomes a problem? So instead, is the challenge really not that they can visually see, but instead that they can comprehend and correlate potential challenges? While we have many different definitions for "wisdom" in context of this topic, I think about it as those individuals which have had the most experience, both good and bad. Coincidentally I am a firm believer that the best service people are those that make the most frequent mistakes. When I was in the field I had lots of experience screwing things up. The difference is that I would always check and tri...
Post a Comment
Read more